Ryujinx/.github/workflows/nightly_pr_comment.yml

71 lines
3.4 KiB
YAML
Raw Normal View History

name: Comment PR artifacts links
Add workflow to automatically check code style issues for PRs (#4670) * Add workflow to perform automated checks for PRs * Downgrade Microsoft.CodeAnalysis to 4.4.0 This is a workaround to fix issues with dotnet-format. See: - https://github.com/dotnet/format/issues/1805 - https://github.com/dotnet/format/issues/1800 * Adjust editorconfig to be more compatible with Ryujinx code-style * Adjust .editorconfig line endings to match .gitattributes * Disable 'prefer switch expression' rule * Remove naming styles These are the default rules, so we don't need to override them. * Silence IDE0060 in .editorconfig * Slightly adjust .editorconfig * Add lost workflow changes * Move .editorconfig comment to the top * .editorconfig: private static readonly fields should be _lowerCamelCase * .editorconfig: Remove alignment for declarations as well * editorconfig: Add rule for local constants * Disable CA1822 for HLE services * Disable CA1822 for ViewModels Bindings won't work with static members, but this issue is silently ignored. * Run dotnet format for the whole solution * Check result code of SDL_GetDisplayBounds * Fix dotnet format style issues * Add missing trailing commas * Update Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp to 4.6.0 Skipping 4.5.0 since it breaks dotnet format * Restore old default naming rules for dotnet format * Add naming rule exception for CPU tests * checks: Include all files before excluding paths * Fix dotnet format issues * Check dotnet format version * checks: Run dotnet format with severity info again * checks: Disable naming style rules until they won't crash the process anymore * Remove unread private member * checks: Attempt to run analyzers 3 times before giving up * checks: Enable naming style rules again with the new retry logic
2023-07-24 16:35:04 +00:00
on:
workflow_run:
Add workflow to automatically check code style issues for PRs (#4670) * Add workflow to perform automated checks for PRs * Downgrade Microsoft.CodeAnalysis to 4.4.0 This is a workaround to fix issues with dotnet-format. See: - https://github.com/dotnet/format/issues/1805 - https://github.com/dotnet/format/issues/1800 * Adjust editorconfig to be more compatible with Ryujinx code-style * Adjust .editorconfig line endings to match .gitattributes * Disable 'prefer switch expression' rule * Remove naming styles These are the default rules, so we don't need to override them. * Silence IDE0060 in .editorconfig * Slightly adjust .editorconfig * Add lost workflow changes * Move .editorconfig comment to the top * .editorconfig: private static readonly fields should be _lowerCamelCase * .editorconfig: Remove alignment for declarations as well * editorconfig: Add rule for local constants * Disable CA1822 for HLE services * Disable CA1822 for ViewModels Bindings won't work with static members, but this issue is silently ignored. * Run dotnet format for the whole solution * Check result code of SDL_GetDisplayBounds * Fix dotnet format style issues * Add missing trailing commas * Update Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp to 4.6.0 Skipping 4.5.0 since it breaks dotnet format * Restore old default naming rules for dotnet format * Add naming rule exception for CPU tests * checks: Include all files before excluding paths * Fix dotnet format issues * Check dotnet format version * checks: Run dotnet format with severity info again * checks: Disable naming style rules until they won't crash the process anymore * Remove unread private member * checks: Attempt to run analyzers 3 times before giving up * checks: Enable naming style rules again with the new retry logic
2023-07-24 16:35:04 +00:00
workflows: ['Perform checks']
types: [completed]
Add workflow to automatically check code style issues for PRs (#4670) * Add workflow to perform automated checks for PRs * Downgrade Microsoft.CodeAnalysis to 4.4.0 This is a workaround to fix issues with dotnet-format. See: - https://github.com/dotnet/format/issues/1805 - https://github.com/dotnet/format/issues/1800 * Adjust editorconfig to be more compatible with Ryujinx code-style * Adjust .editorconfig line endings to match .gitattributes * Disable 'prefer switch expression' rule * Remove naming styles These are the default rules, so we don't need to override them. * Silence IDE0060 in .editorconfig * Slightly adjust .editorconfig * Add lost workflow changes * Move .editorconfig comment to the top * .editorconfig: private static readonly fields should be _lowerCamelCase * .editorconfig: Remove alignment for declarations as well * editorconfig: Add rule for local constants * Disable CA1822 for HLE services * Disable CA1822 for ViewModels Bindings won't work with static members, but this issue is silently ignored. * Run dotnet format for the whole solution * Check result code of SDL_GetDisplayBounds * Fix dotnet format style issues * Add missing trailing commas * Update Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp to 4.6.0 Skipping 4.5.0 since it breaks dotnet format * Restore old default naming rules for dotnet format * Add naming rule exception for CPU tests * checks: Include all files before excluding paths * Fix dotnet format issues * Check dotnet format version * checks: Run dotnet format with severity info again * checks: Disable naming style rules until they won't crash the process anymore * Remove unread private member * checks: Attempt to run analyzers 3 times before giving up * checks: Enable naming style rules again with the new retry logic
2023-07-24 16:35:04 +00:00
jobs:
pr_comment:
if: github.event.workflow_run.event == 'pull_request' && github.event.workflow_run.conclusion == 'success'
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
timeout-minutes: ${{ fromJSON(vars.JOB_TIMEOUT) }}
steps:
- uses: actions/github-script@v6
with:
script: |
const {owner, repo} = context.repo;
const run_id = ${{github.event.workflow_run.id}};
const pull_head_sha = '${{github.event.workflow_run.head_sha}}';
const issue_number = await (async () => {
const pulls = await github.rest.pulls.list({owner, repo});
for await (const {data} of github.paginate.iterator(pulls)) {
for (const pull of data) {
if (pull.head.sha === pull_head_sha) {
return pull.number;
}
}
}
})();
if (issue_number) {
core.info(`Using pull request ${issue_number}`);
} else {
return core.error(`No matching pull request found`);
}
const {data: {artifacts}} = await github.rest.actions.listWorkflowRunArtifacts({owner, repo, run_id});
if (!artifacts.length) {
return core.error(`No artifacts found`);
}
let body = `Download the artifacts for this pull request:\n`;
let hidden_gtk_artifacts = `\n\n <details><summary>Old GUI (GTK3)</summary>\n`;
let hidden_headless_artifacts = `\n\n <details><summary>GUI-less (SDL2)</summary>\n`;
2021-04-03 18:18:13 +00:00
let hidden_debug_artifacts = `\n\n <details><summary>Only for Developers</summary>\n`;
for (const art of artifacts) {
if(art.name.includes('Debug')) {
2021-04-03 18:18:13 +00:00
hidden_debug_artifacts += `\n* [${art.name}](https://nightly.link/${owner}/${repo}/actions/artifacts/${art.id}.zip)`;
} else if(art.name.includes('gtk-ryujinx')) {
hidden_gtk_artifacts += `\n* [${art.name}](https://nightly.link/${owner}/${repo}/actions/artifacts/${art.id}.zip)`;
} else if(art.name.includes('sdl2-ryujinx-headless')) {
hidden_headless_artifacts += `\n* [${art.name}](https://nightly.link/${owner}/${repo}/actions/artifacts/${art.id}.zip)`;
} else {
2021-04-03 18:18:13 +00:00
body += `\n* [${art.name}](https://nightly.link/${owner}/${repo}/actions/artifacts/${art.id}.zip)`;
}
}
hidden_gtk_artifacts += `\n</details>`;
hidden_headless_artifacts += `\n</details>`;
2021-04-03 18:18:13 +00:00
hidden_debug_artifacts += `\n</details>`;
body += hidden_gtk_artifacts;
body += hidden_headless_artifacts;
2021-04-03 18:18:13 +00:00
body += hidden_debug_artifacts;
const {data: comments} = await github.rest.issues.listComments({repo, owner, issue_number});
const existing_comment = comments.find((c) => c.user.login === 'github-actions[bot]');
if (existing_comment) {
core.info(`Updating comment ${existing_comment.id}`);
await github.rest.issues.updateComment({repo, owner, comment_id: existing_comment.id, body});
} else {
core.info(`Creating a comment`);
await github.rest.issues.createComment({repo, owner, issue_number, body});
}