ryujinx/SDL
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Ryujinx/SDL.git synced 2024-12-22 19:15:29 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

testautomation_surface: Really make pitch + alignment overflow

Browse source 
Adding 3 bytes of alignment to 0x7fff'ffff is not enough to make it
overflow a 4-byte unsigned size_t, so this test was not exercising
the intended failure mode. We cannot actually make this overflow
with a signed 32-bit width and an 8-bit format: the maximum width is
not enough to achieve that. However, if we switch to a 24-bit format,
we can make the calculation overflow.

In SDL 2, this test bug was hidden by the fact that allocating
0x7fff'ffff bytes on a 32-bit platform will usually fail, and SDL 2
reported both "malloc() failed" and "this amount of memory is too large
for a size_t" with the same error code.

Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@collabora.com>
This commit is contained in:
Simon McVittie 2024-01-18 19:35:33 +00:00 committed by Sam Lantinga
parent cc7fe8c255
commit 62d063f735
1 changed files with 3 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
test/testautomation_surface.c
View file

@ -766,7 +766,9 @@ int surface_testOverflow(void *arg)
if (sizeof(size_t) == 4 && sizeof(int) >= 4) {
expectedError = "Out of memory";
surface = SDL_CreateRGBSurfaceWithFormat(0, SDL_MAX_SINT32, 1, 8, SDL_PIXELFORMAT_INDEX8);
/* 0x5555'5555 * 3bpp = 0xffff'ffff which fits in size_t, but adding
* alignment padding makes it overflow */
surface = SDL_CreateRGBSurfaceWithFormat(0, 0x55555555, 1, 24, SDL_PIXELFORMAT_RGB24);
SDLTest_AssertCheck(surface == NULL, "Should detect overflow in width + alignment");
SDLTest_AssertCheck(SDL_strcmp(SDL_GetError(), expectedError) == 0,
"Expected \"%s\", got \"%s\"", expectedError, SDL_GetError());