Commit graph

8 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sam Lantinga e3cc5b2c6b Updated copyright for 2018 2018-01-03 10:03:25 -08:00
Sam Lantinga 72ab258812 Fixed bug 2764 - Timer is not rescheduled with the returned interval
afwlehmann

Sorry for re-opening, but it turns out that the current interval is indeed not updated. I've just checked the source code of the 2.0.3 release again:

   163	    if (current->canceled) {
   164	        interval = 0;
   165	    } else {
   166	        interval = current->callback(current->interval, current->param);
   167	    }
   168
   169	    if (interval > 0) {
   170	        /* Reschedule this timer */
   171	        current->interval = interval; // <-- this line is missing
   172	        current->scheduled = tick + interval;
   173	        SDL_AddTimerInternal(data, current);
   174	    } else {

According to the documentation: "The callback function is passed the current timer interval and the user supplied parameter from the SDL_AddTimer() call and returns the next timer interval. If the returned value from the callback is 0, the timer is canceled."

If I understand the text correctly, then the current interval should in fact be updated according to the returned value. Otherwise there would be a discrepancy between the next time for which the timer is actually re-scheduled and the value that's passed to the callback once the timer fires again.

This could be fixed by adding line #171.
2017-08-13 21:48:40 -07:00
Sam Lantinga ca5c304814 Fixed bug 3744 - missing SDLCALL in several functions
Ozkan Sezer

The attached patch adds missing SDLCALL to several functions, so that
they properly match the headers as intended.
2017-08-13 21:06:52 -07:00
Sam Lantinga 45b774e3f7 Updated copyright for 2017 2017-01-01 18:33:28 -08:00
Ryan C. Gordon c61675dc5d threads: Move SDL's own thread creation to a new internal API.
This allows us to set an explicit stack size (overriding the system default
and the global hint an app might have set), and remove all the macro salsa
for dealing with _beginthreadex and such, as internal threads always set those
to NULL anyhow.

I've taken some guesses on reasonable (and tiny!) stack sizes for our
internal threads, but some of these might turn out to be too small in
practice and need an increase. Most of them are simple functions, though.
2016-04-12 16:45:10 -04:00
Ryan C. Gordon fa8c83c1c1 Remove almost all instances of "volatile" keyword.
As Tiffany pointed out in Bugzilla, volatile is not useful for thread safety:

https://software.intel.com/en-us/blogs/2007/11/30/volatile-almost-useless-for-multi-threaded-programming/

Some of these volatiles didn't need to be, some were otherwise protected by
spinlocks or mutexes, and some got moved over to SDL_atomic_t data, etc.

Fixes Bugzilla #3220.
2016-01-03 06:50:50 -05:00
Sam Lantinga 42065e785d Updated copyright to 2016 2016-01-02 10:10:34 -08:00
Philipp Wiesemann 0e45984fa0 Fixed crash if initialization of EGL failed but was tried again later.
The internal function SDL_EGL_LoadLibrary() did not delete and remove a mostly
uninitialized data structure if loading the library first failed. A later try to
use EGL then skipped initialization and assumed it was previously successful
because the data structure now already existed. This led to at least one crash
in the internal function SDL_EGL_ChooseConfig() because a NULL pointer was
dereferenced to make a call to eglBindAPI().
2015-06-21 17:33:46 +02:00