enables C++17 mode

Breakpad has started to use C++17 features, and needs to be compiled
using C++17.

Bug: b:238678030, b:243982778
Test: Locally, CQ
Change-Id: Ia339f0815d2efd2a49fa9b788044b5b0163f95fa
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/breakpad/breakpad/+/3954471
Reviewed-by: Mark Mentovai <mark@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Manoj Gupta <manojgupta@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Joshua Peraza <jperaza@chromium.org>

Makefile.in

@@ -2446,7 +2446,7 @@ GMOCK_LIBS = @GMOCK_LIBS@
 GREP = @GREP@
 GTEST_CFLAGS = @GTEST_CFLAGS@
 GTEST_LIBS = @GTEST_LIBS@
-HAVE_CXX11 = @HAVE_CXX11@
+HAVE_CXX17 = @HAVE_CXX17@
 INSTALL = @INSTALL@
 INSTALL_DATA = @INSTALL_DATA@
 INSTALL_PROGRAM = @INSTALL_PROGRAM@

configure

@@ -676,7 +676,7 @@ ANDROID_HOST_TRUE
 LINUX_HOST_FALSE
 LINUX_HOST_TRUE
 WARN_CXXFLAGS
-HAVE_CXX11
+HAVE_CXX17
 HAVE_MEMFD_CREATE_FALSE
 HAVE_MEMFD_CREATE_TRUE
 HAVE_GETCONTEXT_FALSE
@@ -7740,335 +7740,30 @@ fi
 
 
 
-      ax_cxx_compile_cxx11_required=true
+  ax_cxx_compile_alternatives="17 1z"    ax_cxx_compile_cxx17_required=true
   ac_ext=cpp
 ac_cpp='$CXXCPP $CPPFLAGS'
 ac_compile='$CXX -c $CXXFLAGS $CPPFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext >&5'
 ac_link='$CXX -o conftest$ac_exeext $CXXFLAGS $CPPFLAGS $LDFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext $LIBS >&5'
 ac_compiler_gnu=$ac_cv_cxx_compiler_gnu
   ac_success=no
-  { printf "%s\n" "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking whether $CXX supports C++11 features by default" >&5
-printf %s "checking whether $CXX supports C++11 features by default... " >&6; }
-if test ${ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx11+y}
-then :
-  printf %s "(cached) " >&6
-else $as_nop
-  cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext
-/* end confdefs.h.  */
 
 
-// If the compiler admits that it is not ready for C++11, why torture it?
-// Hopefully, this will speed up the test.
-
-#ifndef __cplusplus
-
-#error "This is not a C++ compiler"
-
-#elif __cplusplus < 201103L
-
-#error "This is not a C++11 compiler"
-
-#else
-
-namespace cxx11
-{
-
-  namespace test_static_assert
-  {
-
-    template <typename T>
-    struct check
-    {
-      static_assert(sizeof(int) <= sizeof(T), "not big enough");
-    };
-
-  }
-
-  namespace test_final_override
-  {
-
-    struct Base
-    {
-      virtual void f() {}
-    };
-
-    struct Derived : public Base
-    {
-      virtual void f() override {}
-    };
-
-  }
-
-  namespace test_double_right_angle_brackets
-  {
-
-    template < typename T >
-    struct check {};
-
-    typedef check<void> single_type;
-    typedef check<check<void>> double_type;
-    typedef check<check<check<void>>> triple_type;
-    typedef check<check<check<check<void>>>> quadruple_type;
-
-  }
-
-  namespace test_decltype
-  {
-
-    int
-    f()
-    {
-      int a = 1;
-      decltype(a) b = 2;
-      return a + b;
-    }
-
-  }
-
-  namespace test_type_deduction
-  {
-
-    template < typename T1, typename T2 >
-    struct is_same
-    {
-      static const bool value = false;
-    };
-
-    template < typename T >
-    struct is_same<T, T>
-    {
-      static const bool value = true;
-    };
-
-    template < typename T1, typename T2 >
-    auto
-    add(T1 a1, T2 a2) -> decltype(a1 + a2)
-    {
-      return a1 + a2;
-    }
-
-    int
-    test(const int c, volatile int v)
-    {
-      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(0)>::value == true, "");
-      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(c)>::value == false, "");
-      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(v)>::value == false, "");
-      auto ac = c;
-      auto av = v;
-      auto sumi = ac + av + 'x';
-      auto sumf = ac + av + 1.0;
-      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(ac)>::value == true, "");
-      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(av)>::value == true, "");
-      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(sumi)>::value == true, "");
-      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(sumf)>::value == false, "");
-      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(add(c, v))>::value == true, "");
-      return (sumf > 0.0) ? sumi : add(c, v);
-    }
-
-  }
-
-  namespace test_noexcept
-  {
-
-    int f() { return 0; }
-    int g() noexcept { return 0; }
-
-    static_assert(noexcept(f()) == false, "");
-    static_assert(noexcept(g()) == true, "");
-
-  }
-
-  namespace test_constexpr
-  {
-
-    template < typename CharT >
-    unsigned long constexpr
-    strlen_c_r(const CharT *const s, const unsigned long acc) noexcept
-    {
-      return *s ? strlen_c_r(s + 1, acc + 1) : acc;
-    }
-
-    template < typename CharT >
-    unsigned long constexpr
-    strlen_c(const CharT *const s) noexcept
-    {
-      return strlen_c_r(s, 0UL);
-    }
-
-    static_assert(strlen_c("") == 0UL, "");
-    static_assert(strlen_c("1") == 1UL, "");
-    static_assert(strlen_c("example") == 7UL, "");
-    static_assert(strlen_c("another\0example") == 7UL, "");
-
-  }
-
-  namespace test_rvalue_references
-  {
-
-    template < int N >
-    struct answer
-    {
-      static constexpr int value = N;
-    };
-
-    answer<1> f(int&)       { return answer<1>(); }
-    answer<2> f(const int&) { return answer<2>(); }
-    answer<3> f(int&&)      { return answer<3>(); }
-
-    void
-    test()
-    {
-      int i = 0;
-      const int c = 0;
-      static_assert(decltype(f(i))::value == 1, "");
-      static_assert(decltype(f(c))::value == 2, "");
-      static_assert(decltype(f(0))::value == 3, "");
-    }
-
-  }
-
-  namespace test_uniform_initialization
-  {
-
-    struct test
-    {
-      static const int zero {};
-      static const int one {1};
-    };
-
-    static_assert(test::zero == 0, "");
-    static_assert(test::one == 1, "");
-
-  }
-
-  namespace test_lambdas
-  {
-
-    void
-    test1()
-    {
-      auto lambda1 = [](){};
-      auto lambda2 = lambda1;
-      lambda1();
-      lambda2();
-    }
-
-    int
-    test2()
-    {
-      auto a = [](int i, int j){ return i + j; }(1, 2);
-      auto b = []() -> int { return '0'; }();
-      auto c = [=](){ return a + b; }();
-      auto d = [&](){ return c; }();
-      auto e = [a, &b](int x) mutable {
-        const auto identity = [](int y){ return y; };
-        for (auto i = 0; i < a; ++i)
-          a += b--;
-        return x + identity(a + b);
-      }(0);
-      return a + b + c + d + e;
-    }
-
-    int
-    test3()
-    {
-      const auto nullary = [](){ return 0; };
-      const auto unary = [](int x){ return x; };
-      using nullary_t = decltype(nullary);
-      using unary_t = decltype(unary);
-      const auto higher1st = [](nullary_t f){ return f(); };
-      const auto higher2nd = [unary](nullary_t f1){
-        return [unary, f1](unary_t f2){ return f2(unary(f1())); };
-      };
-      return higher1st(nullary) + higher2nd(nullary)(unary);
-    }
-
-  }
-
-  namespace test_variadic_templates
-  {
-
-    template <int...>
-    struct sum;
-
-    template <int N0, int... N1toN>
-    struct sum<N0, N1toN...>
-    {
-      static constexpr auto value = N0 + sum<N1toN...>::value;
-    };
-
-    template <>
-    struct sum<>
-    {
-      static constexpr auto value = 0;
-    };
-
-    static_assert(sum<>::value == 0, "");
-    static_assert(sum<1>::value == 1, "");
-    static_assert(sum<23>::value == 23, "");
-    static_assert(sum<1, 2>::value == 3, "");
-    static_assert(sum<5, 5, 11>::value == 21, "");
-    static_assert(sum<2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13>::value == 41, "");
-
-  }
-
-  // http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13728184/template-aliases-and-sfinae
-  // Clang 3.1 fails with headers of libstd++ 4.8.3 when using std::function
-  // because of this.
-  namespace test_template_alias_sfinae
-  {
-
-    struct foo {};
-
-    template<typename T>
-    using member = typename T::member_type;
-
-    template<typename T>
-    void func(...) {}
-
-    template<typename T>
-    void func(member<T>*) {}
-
-    void test();
-
-    void test() { func<foo>(0); }
-
-  }
-
-}  // namespace cxx11
-
-#endif  // __cplusplus >= 201103L
-
-
-
-_ACEOF
-if ac_fn_cxx_try_compile "$LINENO"
-then :
-  ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx11=yes
-else $as_nop
-  ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx11=no
-fi
-rm -f core conftest.err conftest.$ac_objext conftest.beam conftest.$ac_ext
-fi
-{ printf "%s\n" "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: $ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx11" >&5
-printf "%s\n" "$ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx11" >&6; }
-  if test x$ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx11 = xyes; then
-    ac_success=yes
-  fi
 
 
 
     if test x$ac_success = xno; then
-                for switch in -std=c++11 -std=c++0x +std=c++11 "-h std=c++11"; do
+                for alternative in ${ax_cxx_compile_alternatives}; do
-      cachevar=`printf "%s\n" "ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx11_$switch" | $as_tr_sh`
+      for switch in -std=c++${alternative} +std=c++${alternative} "-h std=c++${alternative}"; do
-      { printf "%s\n" "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking whether $CXX supports C++11 features with $switch" >&5
+        cachevar=`printf "%s\n" "ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx17_$switch" | $as_tr_sh`
-printf %s "checking whether $CXX supports C++11 features with $switch... " >&6; }
+        { printf "%s\n" "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking whether $CXX supports C++17 features with $switch" >&5
+printf %s "checking whether $CXX supports C++17 features with $switch... " >&6; }
 if eval test \${$cachevar+y}
 then :
   printf %s "(cached) " >&6
 else $as_nop
-  ac_save_CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS"
+  ac_save_CXX="$CXX"
-         CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS $switch"
+           CXX="$CXX $switch"
            cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext
 /* end confdefs.h.  */
 
@@ -8080,7 +7775,11 @@ else $as_nop
 
 #error "This is not a C++ compiler"
 
-#elif __cplusplus < 201103L
+// MSVC always sets __cplusplus to 199711L in older versions; newer versions
+// only set it correctly if /Zc:__cplusplus is specified as well as a
+// /std:c++NN switch:
+// https://devblogs.microsoft.com/cppblog/msvc-now-correctly-reports-__cplusplus/
+#elif __cplusplus < 201103L && !defined _MSC_VER
 
 #error "This is not a C++11 compiler"
 
@@ -8105,11 +7804,13 @@ namespace cxx11
 
     struct Base
     {
+      virtual ~Base() {}
       virtual void f() {}
     };
 
     struct Derived : public Base
     {
+      virtual ~Derived() override {}
       virtual void f() override {}
     };
 
@@ -8357,6 +8058,504 @@ namespace cxx11
 
 
 
+
+// If the compiler admits that it is not ready for C++14, why torture it?
+// Hopefully, this will speed up the test.
+
+#ifndef __cplusplus
+
+#error "This is not a C++ compiler"
+
+#elif __cplusplus < 201402L && !defined _MSC_VER
+
+#error "This is not a C++14 compiler"
+
+#else
+
+namespace cxx14
+{
+
+  namespace test_polymorphic_lambdas
+  {
+
+    int
+    test()
+    {
+      const auto lambda = [](auto&&... args){
+        const auto istiny = [](auto x){
+          return (sizeof(x) == 1UL) ? 1 : 0;
+        };
+        const int aretiny[] = { istiny(args)... };
+        return aretiny[0];
+      };
+      return lambda(1, 1L, 1.0f, '1');
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_binary_literals
+  {
+
+    constexpr auto ivii = 0b0000000000101010;
+    static_assert(ivii == 42, "wrong value");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_generalized_constexpr
+  {
+
+    template < typename CharT >
+    constexpr unsigned long
+    strlen_c(const CharT *const s) noexcept
+    {
+      auto length = 0UL;
+      for (auto p = s; *p; ++p)
+        ++length;
+      return length;
+    }
+
+    static_assert(strlen_c("") == 0UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("x") == 1UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("test") == 4UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("another\0test") == 7UL, "");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_lambda_init_capture
+  {
+
+    int
+    test()
+    {
+      auto x = 0;
+      const auto lambda1 = [a = x](int b){ return a + b; };
+      const auto lambda2 = [a = lambda1(x)](){ return a; };
+      return lambda2();
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_digit_separators
+  {
+
+    constexpr auto ten_million = 100'000'000;
+    static_assert(ten_million == 100000000, "");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_return_type_deduction
+  {
+
+    auto f(int& x) { return x; }
+    decltype(auto) g(int& x) { return x; }
+
+    template < typename T1, typename T2 >
+    struct is_same
+    {
+      static constexpr auto value = false;
+    };
+
+    template < typename T >
+    struct is_same<T, T>
+    {
+      static constexpr auto value = true;
+    };
+
+    int
+    test()
+    {
+      auto x = 0;
+      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(f(x))>::value, "");
+      static_assert(is_same<int&, decltype(g(x))>::value, "");
+      return x;
+    }
+
+  }
+
+}  // namespace cxx14
+
+#endif  // __cplusplus >= 201402L
+
+
+
+
+// If the compiler admits that it is not ready for C++17, why torture it?
+// Hopefully, this will speed up the test.
+
+#ifndef __cplusplus
+
+#error "This is not a C++ compiler"
+
+#elif __cplusplus < 201703L && !defined _MSC_VER
+
+#error "This is not a C++17 compiler"
+
+#else
+
+#include <initializer_list>
+#include <utility>
+#include <type_traits>
+
+namespace cxx17
+{
+
+  namespace test_constexpr_lambdas
+  {
+
+    constexpr int foo = [](){return 42;}();
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test::nested_namespace::definitions
+  {
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_fold_expression
+  {
+
+    template<typename... Args>
+    int multiply(Args... args)
+    {
+      return (args * ... * 1);
+    }
+
+    template<typename... Args>
+    bool all(Args... args)
+    {
+      return (args && ...);
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_extended_static_assert
+  {
+
+    static_assert (true);
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_auto_brace_init_list
+  {
+
+    auto foo = {5};
+    auto bar {5};
+
+    static_assert(std::is_same<std::initializer_list<int>, decltype(foo)>::value);
+    static_assert(std::is_same<int, decltype(bar)>::value);
+  }
+
+  namespace test_typename_in_template_template_parameter
+  {
+
+    template<template<typename> typename X> struct D;
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_fallthrough_nodiscard_maybe_unused_attributes
+  {
+
+    int f1()
+    {
+      return 42;
+    }
+
+    [[nodiscard]] int f2()
+    {
+      [[maybe_unused]] auto unused = f1();
+
+      switch (f1())
+      {
+      case 17:
+        f1();
+        [[fallthrough]];
+      case 42:
+        f1();
+      }
+      return f1();
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_extended_aggregate_initialization
+  {
+
+    struct base1
+    {
+      int b1, b2 = 42;
+    };
+
+    struct base2
+    {
+      base2() {
+        b3 = 42;
+      }
+      int b3;
+    };
+
+    struct derived : base1, base2
+    {
+        int d;
+    };
+
+    derived d1 {{1, 2}, {}, 4};  // full initialization
+    derived d2 {{}, {}, 4};      // value-initialized bases
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_general_range_based_for_loop
+  {
+
+    struct iter
+    {
+      int i;
+
+      int& operator* ()
+      {
+        return i;
+      }
+
+      const int& operator* () const
+      {
+        return i;
+      }
+
+      iter& operator++()
+      {
+        ++i;
+        return *this;
+      }
+    };
+
+    struct sentinel
+    {
+      int i;
+    };
+
+    bool operator== (const iter& i, const sentinel& s)
+    {
+      return i.i == s.i;
+    }
+
+    bool operator!= (const iter& i, const sentinel& s)
+    {
+      return !(i == s);
+    }
+
+    struct range
+    {
+      iter begin() const
+      {
+        return {0};
+      }
+
+      sentinel end() const
+      {
+        return {5};
+      }
+    };
+
+    void f()
+    {
+      range r {};
+
+      for (auto i : r)
+      {
+        [[maybe_unused]] auto v = i;
+      }
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_lambda_capture_asterisk_this_by_value
+  {
+
+    struct t
+    {
+      int i;
+      int foo()
+      {
+        return [*this]()
+        {
+          return i;
+        }();
+      }
+    };
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_enum_class_construction
+  {
+
+    enum class byte : unsigned char
+    {};
+
+    byte foo {42};
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_constexpr_if
+  {
+
+    template <bool cond>
+    int f ()
+    {
+      if constexpr(cond)
+      {
+        return 13;
+      }
+      else
+      {
+        return 42;
+      }
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_selection_statement_with_initializer
+  {
+
+    int f()
+    {
+      return 13;
+    }
+
+    int f2()
+    {
+      if (auto i = f(); i > 0)
+      {
+        return 3;
+      }
+
+      switch (auto i = f(); i + 4)
+      {
+      case 17:
+        return 2;
+
+      default:
+        return 1;
+      }
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_template_argument_deduction_for_class_templates
+  {
+
+    template <typename T1, typename T2>
+    struct pair
+    {
+      pair (T1 p1, T2 p2)
+        : m1 {p1},
+          m2 {p2}
+      {}
+
+      T1 m1;
+      T2 m2;
+    };
+
+    void f()
+    {
+      [[maybe_unused]] auto p = pair{13, 42u};
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_non_type_auto_template_parameters
+  {
+
+    template <auto n>
+    struct B
+    {};
+
+    B<5> b1;
+    B<'a'> b2;
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_structured_bindings
+  {
+
+    int arr[2] = { 1, 2 };
+    std::pair<int, int> pr = { 1, 2 };
+
+    auto f1() -> int(&)[2]
+    {
+      return arr;
+    }
+
+    auto f2() -> std::pair<int, int>&
+    {
+      return pr;
+    }
+
+    struct S
+    {
+      int x1 : 2;
+      volatile double y1;
+    };
+
+    S f3()
+    {
+      return {};
+    }
+
+    auto [ x1, y1 ] = f1();
+    auto& [ xr1, yr1 ] = f1();
+    auto [ x2, y2 ] = f2();
+    auto& [ xr2, yr2 ] = f2();
+    const auto [ x3, y3 ] = f3();
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_exception_spec_type_system
+  {
+
+    struct Good {};
+    struct Bad {};
+
+    void g1() noexcept;
+    void g2();
+
+    template<typename T>
+    Bad
+    f(T*, T*);
+
+    template<typename T1, typename T2>
+    Good
+    f(T1*, T2*);
+
+    static_assert (std::is_same_v<Good, decltype(f(g1, g2))>);
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_inline_variables
+  {
+
+    template<class T> void f(T)
+    {}
+
+    template<class T> inline T g(T)
+    {
+      return T{};
+    }
+
+    template<> inline void f<>(int)
+    {}
+
+    template<> int g<>(int)
+    {
+      return 5;
+    }
+
+  }
+
+}  // namespace cxx17
+
+#endif  // __cplusplus < 201703L && !defined _MSC_VER
+
+
+
 _ACEOF
 if ac_fn_cxx_try_compile "$LINENO"
 then :
@@ -8365,17 +8564,24 @@ else $as_nop
   eval $cachevar=no
 fi
 rm -f core conftest.err conftest.$ac_objext conftest.beam conftest.$ac_ext
-         CXXFLAGS="$ac_save_CXXFLAGS"
+           CXX="$ac_save_CXX"
 fi
 eval ac_res=\$$cachevar
 	       { printf "%s\n" "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: $ac_res" >&5
 printf "%s\n" "$ac_res" >&6; }
         if eval test x\$$cachevar = xyes; then
-        CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS $switch"
+          CXX="$CXX $switch"
+          if test -n "$CXXCPP" ; then
+            CXXCPP="$CXXCPP $switch"
+          fi
           ac_success=yes
           break
         fi
       done
+      if test x$ac_success = xyes; then
+        break
+      fi
+    done
   fi
   ac_ext=c
 ac_cpp='$CPP $CPPFLAGS'
@@ -8383,25 +8589,23 @@ ac_compile='$CC -c $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext >&5'
 ac_link='$CC -o conftest$ac_exeext $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS $LDFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext $LIBS >&5'
 ac_compiler_gnu=$ac_cv_c_compiler_gnu
 
-  if test x$ax_cxx_compile_cxx11_required = xtrue; then
+  if test x$ax_cxx_compile_cxx17_required = xtrue; then
     if test x$ac_success = xno; then
-      as_fn_error $? "*** A compiler with support for C++11 language features is required." "$LINENO" 5
+      as_fn_error $? "*** A compiler with support for C++17 language features is required." "$LINENO" 5
+    fi
   fi
-  else
   if test x$ac_success = xno; then
-      HAVE_CXX11=0
+    HAVE_CXX17=0
-      { printf "%s\n" "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: No compiler with C++11 support was found" >&5
+    { printf "%s\n" "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: No compiler with C++17 support was found" >&5
-printf "%s\n" "$as_me: No compiler with C++11 support was found" >&6;}
+printf "%s\n" "$as_me: No compiler with C++17 support was found" >&6;}
   else
-      HAVE_CXX11=1
+    HAVE_CXX17=1
 
-printf "%s\n" "#define HAVE_CXX11 1" >>confdefs.h
+printf "%s\n" "#define HAVE_CXX17 1" >>confdefs.h
 
   fi
 
 
-  fi
-
 
 WARN_CXXFLAGS=
 ac_ext=cpp

configure.ac

@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ AC_CHECK_FUNCS([arc4random getcontext getrandom memfd_create])
 AM_CONDITIONAL([HAVE_GETCONTEXT], [test "x$ac_cv_func_getcontext" = xyes])
 AM_CONDITIONAL([HAVE_MEMFD_CREATE], [test "x$ac_cv_func_memfd_create" = xyes])
 
-AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX(11, noext, mandatory)
+AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX(17, noext, mandatory)
 
 dnl Test supported warning flags.
 WARN_CXXFLAGS=

m4/ax_cxx_compile_stdcxx.m4

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 # ===========================================================================
-#   http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf-archive/ax_cxx_compile_stdcxx.html
+#  https://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf-archive/ax_cxx_compile_stdcxx.html
 # ===========================================================================
 #
 # SYNOPSIS
@@ -9,14 +9,14 @@
 # DESCRIPTION
 #
 #   Check for baseline language coverage in the compiler for the specified
-#   version of the C++ standard.  If necessary, add switches to CXXFLAGS to
+#   version of the C++ standard.  If necessary, add switches to CXX and
-#   enable support.  VERSION may be '11' (for the C++11 standard) or '14'
+#   CXXCPP to enable support.  VERSION may be '11', '14', '17', or '20' for
-#   (for the C++14 standard).
+#   the respective C++ standard version.
 #
 #   The second argument, if specified, indicates whether you insist on an
 #   extended mode (e.g. -std=gnu++11) or a strict conformance mode (e.g.
 #   -std=c++11).  If neither is specified, you get whatever works, with
-#   preference for an extended mode.
+#   preference for no added switch, and then for an extended mode.
 #
 #   The third argument, if specified 'mandatory' or if left unspecified,
 #   indicates that baseline support for the specified C++ standard is
@@ -33,21 +33,26 @@
 #   Copyright (c) 2014, 2015 Google Inc.; contributed by Alexey Sokolov <sokolov@google.com>
 #   Copyright (c) 2015 Paul Norman <penorman@mac.com>
 #   Copyright (c) 2015 Moritz Klammler <moritz@klammler.eu>
+#   Copyright (c) 2016, 2018 Krzesimir Nowak <qdlacz@gmail.com>
+#   Copyright (c) 2019 Enji Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>
+#   Copyright (c) 2020 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
+#   Copyright (c) 2021 Jörn Heusipp <osmanx@problemloesungsmaschine.de>
 #
 #   Copying and distribution of this file, with or without modification, are
 #   permitted in any medium without royalty provided the copyright notice
 #   and this notice are preserved.  This file is offered as-is, without any
 #   warranty.
 
-#serial 1
+#serial 15
 
 dnl  This macro is based on the code from the AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_11 macro
 dnl  (serial version number 13).
 
 AC_DEFUN([AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX], [dnl
-  m4_if([$1], [11], [],
+  m4_if([$1], [11], [ax_cxx_compile_alternatives="11 0x"],
-        [$1], [14], [],
+        [$1], [14], [ax_cxx_compile_alternatives="14 1y"],
-        [$1], [17], [m4_fatal([support for C++17 not yet implemented in AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX])],
+        [$1], [17], [ax_cxx_compile_alternatives="17 1z"],
+        [$1], [20], [ax_cxx_compile_alternatives="20"],
         [m4_fatal([invalid first argument `$1' to AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX])])dnl
   m4_if([$2], [], [],
         [$2], [ext], [],
@@ -59,6 +64,8 @@ AC_DEFUN([AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX], [dnl
         [m4_fatal([invalid third argument `$3' to AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX])])
   AC_LANG_PUSH([C++])dnl
   ac_success=no
+
+  m4_if([$2], [], [dnl
     AC_CACHE_CHECK(whether $CXX supports C++$1 features by default,
 		   ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx$1,
       [AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_SOURCE([_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_$1])],
@@ -66,22 +73,26 @@ AC_DEFUN([AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX], [dnl
         [ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx$1=no])])
     if test x$ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx$1 = xyes; then
       ac_success=yes
-  fi
+    fi])
 
   m4_if([$2], [noext], [], [dnl
   if test x$ac_success = xno; then
-    for switch in -std=gnu++$1 -std=gnu++0x; do
+    for alternative in ${ax_cxx_compile_alternatives}; do
+      switch="-std=gnu++${alternative}"
       cachevar=AS_TR_SH([ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx$1_$switch])
       AC_CACHE_CHECK(whether $CXX supports C++$1 features with $switch,
                      $cachevar,
-        [ac_save_CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS"
+        [ac_save_CXX="$CXX"
-         CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS $switch"
+         CXX="$CXX $switch"
          AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_SOURCE([_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_$1])],
           [eval $cachevar=yes],
           [eval $cachevar=no])
-         CXXFLAGS="$ac_save_CXXFLAGS"])
+         CXX="$ac_save_CXX"])
       if eval test x\$$cachevar = xyes; then
-        CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS $switch"
+        CXX="$CXX $switch"
+        if test -n "$CXXCPP" ; then
+          CXXCPP="$CXXCPP $switch"
+        fi
         ac_success=yes
         break
       fi
@@ -93,29 +104,37 @@ AC_DEFUN([AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX], [dnl
     dnl HP's aCC needs +std=c++11 according to:
     dnl http://h21007.www2.hp.com/portal/download/files/unprot/aCxx/PDF_Release_Notes/769149-001.pdf
     dnl Cray's crayCC needs "-h std=c++11"
-    for switch in -std=c++$1 -std=c++0x +std=c++$1 "-h std=c++$1"; do
+    for alternative in ${ax_cxx_compile_alternatives}; do
+      for switch in -std=c++${alternative} +std=c++${alternative} "-h std=c++${alternative}"; do
         cachevar=AS_TR_SH([ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx$1_$switch])
         AC_CACHE_CHECK(whether $CXX supports C++$1 features with $switch,
                        $cachevar,
-        [ac_save_CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS"
+          [ac_save_CXX="$CXX"
-         CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS $switch"
+           CXX="$CXX $switch"
            AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_SOURCE([_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_$1])],
             [eval $cachevar=yes],
             [eval $cachevar=no])
-         CXXFLAGS="$ac_save_CXXFLAGS"])
+           CXX="$ac_save_CXX"])
         if eval test x\$$cachevar = xyes; then
-        CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS $switch"
+          CXX="$CXX $switch"
+          if test -n "$CXXCPP" ; then
+            CXXCPP="$CXXCPP $switch"
+          fi
           ac_success=yes
           break
         fi
       done
+      if test x$ac_success = xyes; then
+        break
+      fi
+    done
   fi])
   AC_LANG_POP([C++])
   if test x$ax_cxx_compile_cxx$1_required = xtrue; then
     if test x$ac_success = xno; then
       AC_MSG_ERROR([*** A compiler with support for C++$1 language features is required.])
     fi
-  else
+  fi
   if test x$ac_success = xno; then
     HAVE_CXX$1=0
     AC_MSG_NOTICE([No compiler with C++$1 support was found])
@@ -124,9 +143,7 @@ AC_DEFUN([AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX], [dnl
     AC_DEFINE(HAVE_CXX$1,1,
               [define if the compiler supports basic C++$1 syntax])
   fi
-
   AC_SUBST(HAVE_CXX$1)
-  fi
 ])
 
 
@@ -136,7 +153,6 @@ m4_define([_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_11],
   _AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_11
 )
 
-
 dnl  Test body for checking C++14 support
 
 m4_define([_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_14],
@@ -144,6 +160,23 @@ m4_define([_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_14],
   _AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_14
 )
 
+dnl  Test body for checking C++17 support
+
+m4_define([_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_17],
+  _AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_11
+  _AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_14
+  _AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_17
+)
+
+dnl  Test body for checking C++20 support
+
+m4_define([_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_20],
+  _AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_11
+  _AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_14
+  _AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_17
+  _AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_20
+)
+
 
 dnl  Tests for new features in C++11
 
@@ -156,7 +189,11 @@ m4_define([_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_11], [[
 
 #error "This is not a C++ compiler"
 
-#elif __cplusplus < 201103L
+// MSVC always sets __cplusplus to 199711L in older versions; newer versions
+// only set it correctly if /Zc:__cplusplus is specified as well as a
+// /std:c++NN switch:
+// https://devblogs.microsoft.com/cppblog/msvc-now-correctly-reports-__cplusplus/
+#elif __cplusplus < 201103L && !defined _MSC_VER
 
 #error "This is not a C++11 compiler"
 
@@ -181,11 +218,13 @@ namespace cxx11
 
     struct Base
     {
+      virtual ~Base() {}
       virtual void f() {}
     };
 
     struct Derived : public Base
     {
+      virtual ~Derived() override {}
       virtual void f() override {}
     };
 
@@ -445,7 +484,7 @@ m4_define([_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_14], [[
 
 #error "This is not a C++ compiler"
 
-#elif __cplusplus < 201402L
+#elif __cplusplus < 201402L && !defined _MSC_VER
 
 #error "This is not a C++14 compiler"
 
@@ -514,7 +553,7 @@ namespace cxx14
 
   }
 
-  namespace test_digit_seperators
+  namespace test_digit_separators
   {
 
     constexpr auto ten_million = 100'000'000;
@@ -556,3 +595,415 @@ namespace cxx14
 #endif  // __cplusplus >= 201402L
 
 ]])
+
+
+dnl  Tests for new features in C++17
+
+m4_define([_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_17], [[
+
+// If the compiler admits that it is not ready for C++17, why torture it?
+// Hopefully, this will speed up the test.
+
+#ifndef __cplusplus
+
+#error "This is not a C++ compiler"
+
+#elif __cplusplus < 201703L && !defined _MSC_VER
+
+#error "This is not a C++17 compiler"
+
+#else
+
+#include <initializer_list>
+#include <utility>
+#include <type_traits>
+
+namespace cxx17
+{
+
+  namespace test_constexpr_lambdas
+  {
+
+    constexpr int foo = [](){return 42;}();
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test::nested_namespace::definitions
+  {
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_fold_expression
+  {
+
+    template<typename... Args>
+    int multiply(Args... args)
+    {
+      return (args * ... * 1);
+    }
+
+    template<typename... Args>
+    bool all(Args... args)
+    {
+      return (args && ...);
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_extended_static_assert
+  {
+
+    static_assert (true);
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_auto_brace_init_list
+  {
+
+    auto foo = {5};
+    auto bar {5};
+
+    static_assert(std::is_same<std::initializer_list<int>, decltype(foo)>::value);
+    static_assert(std::is_same<int, decltype(bar)>::value);
+  }
+
+  namespace test_typename_in_template_template_parameter
+  {
+
+    template<template<typename> typename X> struct D;
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_fallthrough_nodiscard_maybe_unused_attributes
+  {
+
+    int f1()
+    {
+      return 42;
+    }
+
+    [[nodiscard]] int f2()
+    {
+      [[maybe_unused]] auto unused = f1();
+
+      switch (f1())
+      {
+      case 17:
+        f1();
+        [[fallthrough]];
+      case 42:
+        f1();
+      }
+      return f1();
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_extended_aggregate_initialization
+  {
+
+    struct base1
+    {
+      int b1, b2 = 42;
+    };
+
+    struct base2
+    {
+      base2() {
+        b3 = 42;
+      }
+      int b3;
+    };
+
+    struct derived : base1, base2
+    {
+        int d;
+    };
+
+    derived d1 {{1, 2}, {}, 4};  // full initialization
+    derived d2 {{}, {}, 4};      // value-initialized bases
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_general_range_based_for_loop
+  {
+
+    struct iter
+    {
+      int i;
+
+      int& operator* ()
+      {
+        return i;
+      }
+
+      const int& operator* () const
+      {
+        return i;
+      }
+
+      iter& operator++()
+      {
+        ++i;
+        return *this;
+      }
+    };
+
+    struct sentinel
+    {
+      int i;
+    };
+
+    bool operator== (const iter& i, const sentinel& s)
+    {
+      return i.i == s.i;
+    }
+
+    bool operator!= (const iter& i, const sentinel& s)
+    {
+      return !(i == s);
+    }
+
+    struct range
+    {
+      iter begin() const
+      {
+        return {0};
+      }
+
+      sentinel end() const
+      {
+        return {5};
+      }
+    };
+
+    void f()
+    {
+      range r {};
+
+      for (auto i : r)
+      {
+        [[maybe_unused]] auto v = i;
+      }
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_lambda_capture_asterisk_this_by_value
+  {
+
+    struct t
+    {
+      int i;
+      int foo()
+      {
+        return [*this]()
+        {
+          return i;
+        }();
+      }
+    };
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_enum_class_construction
+  {
+
+    enum class byte : unsigned char
+    {};
+
+    byte foo {42};
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_constexpr_if
+  {
+
+    template <bool cond>
+    int f ()
+    {
+      if constexpr(cond)
+      {
+        return 13;
+      }
+      else
+      {
+        return 42;
+      }
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_selection_statement_with_initializer
+  {
+
+    int f()
+    {
+      return 13;
+    }
+
+    int f2()
+    {
+      if (auto i = f(); i > 0)
+      {
+        return 3;
+      }
+
+      switch (auto i = f(); i + 4)
+      {
+      case 17:
+        return 2;
+
+      default:
+        return 1;
+      }
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_template_argument_deduction_for_class_templates
+  {
+
+    template <typename T1, typename T2>
+    struct pair
+    {
+      pair (T1 p1, T2 p2)
+        : m1 {p1},
+          m2 {p2}
+      {}
+
+      T1 m1;
+      T2 m2;
+    };
+
+    void f()
+    {
+      [[maybe_unused]] auto p = pair{13, 42u};
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_non_type_auto_template_parameters
+  {
+
+    template <auto n>
+    struct B
+    {};
+
+    B<5> b1;
+    B<'a'> b2;
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_structured_bindings
+  {
+
+    int arr[2] = { 1, 2 };
+    std::pair<int, int> pr = { 1, 2 };
+
+    auto f1() -> int(&)[2]
+    {
+      return arr;
+    }
+
+    auto f2() -> std::pair<int, int>&
+    {
+      return pr;
+    }
+
+    struct S
+    {
+      int x1 : 2;
+      volatile double y1;
+    };
+
+    S f3()
+    {
+      return {};
+    }
+
+    auto [ x1, y1 ] = f1();
+    auto& [ xr1, yr1 ] = f1();
+    auto [ x2, y2 ] = f2();
+    auto& [ xr2, yr2 ] = f2();
+    const auto [ x3, y3 ] = f3();
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_exception_spec_type_system
+  {
+
+    struct Good {};
+    struct Bad {};
+
+    void g1() noexcept;
+    void g2();
+
+    template<typename T>
+    Bad
+    f(T*, T*);
+
+    template<typename T1, typename T2>
+    Good
+    f(T1*, T2*);
+
+    static_assert (std::is_same_v<Good, decltype(f(g1, g2))>);
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_inline_variables
+  {
+
+    template<class T> void f(T)
+    {}
+
+    template<class T> inline T g(T)
+    {
+      return T{};
+    }
+
+    template<> inline void f<>(int)
+    {}
+
+    template<> int g<>(int)
+    {
+      return 5;
+    }
+
+  }
+
+}  // namespace cxx17
+
+#endif  // __cplusplus < 201703L && !defined _MSC_VER
+
+]])
+
+
+dnl  Tests for new features in C++20
+
+m4_define([_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_20], [[
+
+#ifndef __cplusplus
+
+#error "This is not a C++ compiler"
+
+#elif __cplusplus < 202002L && !defined _MSC_VER
+
+#error "This is not a C++20 compiler"
+
+#else
+
+#include <version>
+
+namespace cxx20
+{
+
+// As C++20 supports feature test macros in the standard, there is no
+// immediate need to actually test for feature availability on the
+// Autoconf side.
+
+}  // namespace cxx20
+
+#endif  // __cplusplus < 202002L && !defined _MSC_VER
+
+]])

src/config.h.in

@@ -6,8 +6,8 @@
 /* Define to 1 if you have the <a.out.h> header file. */
 #undef HAVE_A_OUT_H
 
-/* define if the compiler supports basic C++11 syntax */
+/* define if the compiler supports basic C++17 syntax */
-#undef HAVE_CXX11
+#undef HAVE_CXX17
 
 /* Define to 1 if you have the `getcontext' function. */
 #undef HAVE_GETCONTEXT