Remove the zeroization of a pointer variable in the AES block
functions. The code was valid but spurious and misleading since it
looked like a mistaken attempt to zeroize the pointed-to buffer.
Reported by Antonio de la Piedra, CEA Leti, France.
Note that we do not zeroize the buffer here because these are the
round keys, and they need to stay until all the blocks are processed.
They will be zeroized in mbedtls_aes_free().
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Starting with commit 49e94e3, the do/while loop in
`rsa_prepare_blinding()` was changed to a `do...while(0)`, which
prevents retry from being effective and leaves dead code.
Restore the while condition to retry, and lift the calls to finish the
computation out of the while loop by by observing that they are
performed only when `mbedtls_mpi_inv_mod()` returns zero.
Signed-off-by: Peter Kolbus <peter.kolbus@garmin.com>
Probably the `W[2 << MBEDTLS_MPI_WINDOW_SIZE]` notation is based on a transcription of 2**MBEDTLS_MPI_WINDOW_SIZE.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Otte <d.otte@wut.de>
RFC5280 does not state that the `revocationDate` should be checked.
In addition, when no time source is available (i.e., when MBEDTLS_HAVE_TIME_DATE is not defined), `mbedtls_x509_time_is_past` always returns 0. This results in the CRL not being checked at all.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280
Signed-off-by: Raoul Strackx <raoul.strackx@fortanix.com>
Currently the new component in all.sh fails because
mbedtls_ssl_cf_memcpy_offset() is not actually constant flow - this is on
purpose to be able to verify that the new test works.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
The tests are supposed to be failing now (in all.sh component
test_memsan_constant_flow), but they don't as apparently MemSan doesn't
complain when the src argument of memcpy() is uninitialized, see
https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/1296
The next commit will add an option to test constant flow with valgrind, which
will hopefully correctly flag the current non-constant-flow implementation.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
This paves the way for a constant-flow implementation of HMAC checking, by
making sure that the comparison happens at a constant address. The missing
step is obviously to copy the HMAC from the secret offset to this temporary
buffer with constant flow, which will be done in the next few commits.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
* mbedtls-2.7: (28 commits)
A different approach of signed-to-unsigned comparison
Update the copy of tests/data_files/server2-sha256.crt in certs.c
Fix bug in redirection of unit test outputs
Backport e2k support to mbedtls-2.7
Don't forget to free G, P, Q, ctr_drbg, and entropy
Regenerate server2-sha256.crt with a PrintableString issuer
Regenerate test client certificates with a PrintableString issuer
cert_write: support all hash algorithms
compat.sh: stop using allow_sha1
compat.sh: quit using SHA-1 certificates
compat.sh: enable CBC-SHA-2 suites for GnuTLS
Fix license header in pre-commit hook
Update copyright notices to use Linux Foundation guidance
Fix building on NetBSD 9.0
Remove obsolete buildbot reference in compat.sh
Fix misuse of printf in shell script
Fix added proxy command when IPv6 is used
Simplify test syntax
Fix logic error in setting client port
ssl-opt.sh: include test name in log files
...
Before this commit, certs.c had a copy of a different version of
tests/data_files/server2-sha256.crt (from the then development branch)
which was generated by cert_write. Update certs.c with the new
tests/data_files/server2-sha256.crt which is also generated by
cert_write.
The new copy has the same size as the old copy so there is no concern
about existing application binaries relying on the size. (The old
tests/data_files/server2-sha256.crt had a different size because it
had been generated by openssl and so had slightly different content.)
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
As a result, the copyright of contributors other than Arm is now
acknowledged, and the years of publishing are no longer tracked in the
source files.
Also remove the now-redundant lines declaring that the files are part of
MbedTLS.
This commit was generated using the following script:
# ========================
#!/bin/sh
# Find files
find '(' -path './.git' -o -path './3rdparty' ')' -prune -o -type f -print | xargs sed -bi '
# Replace copyright attribution line
s/Copyright.*Arm.*/Copyright The Mbed TLS Contributors/I
# Remove redundant declaration and the preceding line
$!N
/This file is part of Mbed TLS/Id
P
D
'
# ========================
Signed-off-by: Bence Szépkúti <bence.szepkuti@arm.com>
In the entries (mbedtls_x509_crl_entry values) on the list constructed
by mbedtls_x509_crl_parse_der(), set entry->raw.tag to
(SEQUENCE | CONSTRUCTED) rather than to the tag of the first ASN.1
element of the entry (which happens to be the tag of the serial
number, so INTEGER or INTEGER | CONTEXT_SPECIFIC). This is doesn't
really matter in practice (and in particular the value is never used
in Mbed TLS itself), and isn't documented, but at least it's
consistent with how mbedtls_x509_buf is normally used.
The primary importance of this change is that the old code tried to
access the tag of the first element of the entry even when the entry
happened to be empty. If the entry was empty and not followed by
anything else in the CRL, this could cause a read 1 byte after the end
of the buffer containing the CRL.
The test case "X509 CRL ASN1 (TBSCertList, single empty entry at end)"
hit the problematic buffer overflow, which is detected with ASan.
Credit to OSS-Fuzz for detecting the problem.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
This is an LTS branch, C99 isn't allowed yet, it breaks versions of MSVC that
we still support for this branch.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
This option allows to test the constant-flow nature of selected code, using
MemSan and the fundamental observation behind ctgrind that the set of
operations allowed on undefined memory by dynamic analysers is the same as the
set of operations allowed on secret data to avoid leaking it to a local
attacker via side channels, namely, any operation except branching and
dereferencing.
(This isn't the full story, as on some CPUs some instructions have variable
execution depending on the inputs, most notably division and on some cores
multiplication. However, testing that no branch or memory access depends on
secret data is already a good start.)
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
Just move code from ssl_decrypt_buf() to the new cf_hmac() function and then
call cf_hmac() from there.
This makes the new cf_hmac() function used and validates that its interface
works for using it in ssl_decrypt_buf().
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
The dummy implementation is not constant-flow at all for now, it's just
here as a starting point and a support for developing the tests and putting
the infrastructure in place.
Depending on the implementation strategy, there might be various corner cases
depending on where the lengths fall relative to block boundaries. So it seems
safer to just test all possible lengths in a given range than to use only a
few randomly-chosen values.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
The condition is a complex and repeated a few times. There were already some
inconsistencies in the repetitions as some of them forgot about DES.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
inv_mod() already returns a specific error code if the value is not
invertible, so no need to check in advance that it is. Also, this is a
preparation for blinding the call to inv_mod(), which is made easier by
avoiding the redundancy (otherwise the call to gcd() would need to be blinded
too).
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
In the next commit, we'll need to draw a second random value, in order to
blind modular inversion. Having a function for that will avoid repetition.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
- it's 2020, there shouldn't be too many systems out there where SHA-1 is the
only available hash option, so its usefulness is limited
- OTOH testing configurations without SHA-2 reveal bugs that are not easy to
fix in a fully compatible way
So overall, the benefit/cost ratio is not good enough to justify keeping SHA-1
as a fallback option here.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
