Add signing tests with 528-bit and 520-bit RSA keys with SHA-512. These
selections of key and hash size should lead to an error returned, as
there is not enough room for our chosen minimum salt size of two bytes
less than the hash size. These test the boundary around an available
salt length of 0 or -1 bytes.
The RSA keys were generated with OpenSSL 1.1.1-pre8.
$ openssl genrsa 520
Generating RSA private key, 520 bit long modulus (2 primes)
.............++++++++++++
.................++++++++++++
e is 65537 (0x010001)
-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----
MIIBPwIBAAJCANWgb4bludh0KFQBZcqWb6iJOmLipZ0L/XYXeAuwOfkWWjc6jhGd
B2b43lVnEPM/ZwGRU7rYIjd155fUUdSCBvO/AgMBAAECQgDOMq+zy6XZEjWi8D5q
j05zpRGgRRiKP/qEtB6BWbZ7gUV9DDgZhD4FFsqfanwjWNG52LkM9D1OQmUOtGGq
a9COwQIhD+6l9iIPrCkblQjsK6jtKB6zmu5NXcaTJUEGgW68cA7PAiENaJGHhcOq
/jHqqi2NgVbc5kWUD/dzSkVzN6Ub0AvIiBECIQIeL2Gw1XSFYm1Fal/DbQNQUX/e
/dnhc94X7s118wbScQIhAMPVgbDc//VurZ+155vYc9PjZlYe3QIAwlkLX3HYKkGx
AiEND8ndKyhkc8jLGlh8aRP8r03zpDIiZNKqCKiijMWVRYQ=
-----END RSA PRIVATE KEY-----
$ openssl genrsa 528
Generating RSA private key, 528 bit long modulus (2 primes)
.........++++++++++++
....++++++++++++
e is 65537 (0x010001)
-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----
MIIBQgIBAAJDAKJVTrpxW/ZuXs3z1tcY4+XZB+hmbnv1p2tBUQbgTrgn7EyyGZz/
ZkkdRUGQggWapbVLDPXu9EQ0AvMEfAsObwJQgQIDAQABAkJhHVXvFjglElxnK7Rg
lERq0k73yqfYQts4wCegTHrrkv3HzqWQVVi29mGLSXTqoQ45gzWZ5Ru5NKjkTjko
YtWWIVECIgDScqoo7SCFrG3zwFxnGe7V3rYYr6LkykpvczC0MK1IZy0CIgDFeINr
qycUXbndZvF0cLYtSmEA+MoN7fRX7jY5w7lZYyUCIUxyiOurEDhe5eY5B5gQbJlW
ePHIw7S244lO3+9lC12U1QIhWgzQ8YKFObZcEejl5xGXIiQvBEBv89Y1fPu2YrUs
iuS5AiFE64NJs8iI+zZxp72esKHPXq/chJ1BvhHsXI0y1OBK8m8=
-----END RSA PRIVATE KEY-----
Since we wish to generate RSASSA-PSS signatures even when hashes are
relatively large for the chosen RSA key size, we need some tests. Our
main focus will be on 1024-bit keys and the couple key sizes larger than
it. For example, we test for a signature generated using a salt length
of 63 when a 1032-bit key is used. Other tests check the boundary
conditions around other key sizes. We want to make sure we don't use a
salt length larger than the hash length (because FIPS 186-4 requires
this). We also want to make sure we don't use a salt that is too small
(no smaller than 2 bytes away from the hash length).
Test RSASSA-PSS signatures with:
- 1024-bit key and SHA-512 (slen 62)
- 1032-bit key and SHA-512 (slen 63)
- 1040-bit key and SHA-512 (slen 64)
- 1048-bit key and SHA-512 (slen 64)
The tests also verify that we can properly verify the RSASSA-PSS
signatures we've generated.
We've manually verified that OpenSSL 1.1.1-pre8 can verify the
RSASSA-PSS signatures we've generated.
$ openssl rsa -in rsa1024.pem -pubout -out pub1024.pem
writing RSA key
$ openssl rsa -in rsa1032.pem -pubout -out pub1032.pem
writing RSA key
$ openssl rsa -in rsa1040.pem -pubout -out pub1040.pem
writing RSA key
$ openssl rsa -in rsa1048.pem -pubout -out pub1048.pem
writing RSA key
$ cat message.bin | openssl dgst -sha512 -sigopt rsa_padding_mode:pss -sigopt rsa_pss_saltlen:62 -verify pub1024.pem -signature valid1024.bin
Verified OK
$ cat message.bin | openssl dgst -sha512 -sigopt rsa_padding_mode:pss -sigopt rsa_pss_saltlen:63 -verify pub1032.pem -signature valid1032.bin
Verified OK
$ cat message.bin | openssl dgst -sha512 -sigopt rsa_padding_mode:pss -sigopt rsa_pss_saltlen:64 -verify pub1040.pem -signature valid1040.bin
Verified OK
$ cat message.bin | openssl dgst -sha512 -sigopt rsa_padding_mode:pss -sigopt rsa_pss_saltlen:64 -verify pub1048.pem -signature valid1048.bin
Verified OK
We've also added a new test that ensures we can properly validate a
RSASSA-PSS 1032-bit signature with SHA-512 generated by OpenSSL. This
has been added as the "RSASSA-PSS Verify OpenSSL-generated Signature
1032-bit w/SHA-512" test. The signature to verify was generated with the
following command line.
$ cat message.bin | openssl dgst -sha512 -sigopt rsa_padding_mode:pss -sigopt rsa_pss_saltlen:63 -sign rsa1032.pem > valid.bin
The RSA private keys used by these tests were generated with OpenSSL
1.1.1-pre8.
$ openssl genrsa 1024
Generating RSA private key, 1024 bit long modulus (2 primes)
........................................++++++
......++++++
e is 65537 (0x010001)
-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----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-----END RSA PRIVATE KEY-----
$ openssl genrsa 1032
Generating RSA private key, 1032 bit long modulus (2 primes)
....................++++++
.................................++++++
e is 65537 (0x010001)
-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----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-----END RSA PRIVATE KEY-----
$ openssl genkey 1040
Generating RSA private key, 1040 bit long modulus
........++++++
........++++++
e is 65537 (0x10001)
-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----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-----END RSA PRIVATE KEY-----
$ openssl genrsa 1048
Generating RSA private key, 1048 bit long modulus (2 primes)
...............................++++++
.++++++
e is 65537 (0x010001)
-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----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-----END RSA PRIVATE KEY-----
It should be valid to RSASSA-PSS sign a SHA-512 hash with a 1024-bit or
1032-bit RSA key, but with the salt size being always equal to the hash
size, this isn't possible: the key is too small.
To enable use of hashes that are relatively large compared to the key
size, allow reducing the salt size to no less than the hash size minus 2
bytes. We don't allow salt sizes smaller than the hash size minus 2
bytes because that too significantly changes the security guarantees the
library provides compared to the previous implementation which always
used a salt size equal to the hash size. The new calculated salt size
remains compliant with FIPS 186-4.
We also need to update the "hash too large" test, since we now reduce
the salt size when certain key sizes are used. We used to not support
1024-bit keys with SHA-512, but now we support this by reducing the salt
size to 62. Update the "hash too large" test to use a 1016-bit RSA key
with SHA-512, which still has too large of a hash because we will not
reduce the salt size further than 2 bytes shorter than the hash size.
The RSA private key used for the test was generated using "openssl
genrsa 1016" using OpenSSL 1.1.1-pre8.
$ openssl genrsa 1016
Generating RSA private key, 1016 bit long modulus (2 primes)
..............++++++
....++++++
e is 65537 (0x010001)
-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----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-----END RSA PRIVATE KEY-----
This commit adds a test to ssl-opt.sh which exercises the behavior
of the library in the situation where a single proper fragment
of a future handshake message is received prior to the next
expected handshake message (concretely, the client receives
the first fragment of the server's Certificate message prior
to the server's ServerHello).
This commit adds two builds to all.sh which use a value of
MBEDTLS_SSL_DTLS_MAX_BUFFERING that allows to run the
reordering tests in ssl-opt.sh introduced in the last commit.
This commit adds tests to ssl-opt.sh which trigger code-paths
responsible for freeing future buffered messages when the buffering
limitations set by MBEDTLS_SSL_DTLS_MAX_BUFFERING don't allow the
next expected message to be reassembled.
These tests only work for very specific ranges of
MBEDTLS_SSL_DTLS_MAX_BUFFERING and will therefore be skipped
on a run of ssl-opt.sh in ordinary configurations.
This commit adds functions requires_config_value_at_most()
and requires_config_value_at_least() which can be used to
only run tests when a numerical value from config.h
(e.g. MBEDTLS_SSL_IN_CONTENT_LEN) is within a certain range.
The negotiated MFL is always the one suggested by the client, even
if the server has a smaller MFL configured locally. Hence, in the test
where the client asks for an MFL of 4096 bytes while the server locally
has an MFL of 512 bytes configured, the client will still send datagrams
of up to ~4K size.
Depending on the settings of the local machine, gnutls-cli will either try
IPv4 or IPv6 when trying to connect to localhost. With TLS, whatever it tries
first, it will notice if any failure happens and try the other protocol if
necessary. With DTLS it can't do that. Unfortunately for now there isn't
really any good way to specify an address and hostname independently, though
that might come soon: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/issues/344
A work around is to specify an address directly and then use --insecure to
ignore certificate hostname mismatch; that is OK for tests that are completely
unrelated to certificate verification (such as the recent fragmenting tests)
but unacceptable for others.
For that reason, don't specify a default hostname for gnutls-cli, but instead
let each test choose between `--insecure 127.0.0.1` and `localhost` (or
`--insecure '::1'` if desired).
Alternatives include:
- having test certificates with 127.0.0.1 as the hostname, but having an IP as
the CN is unusual, and we would need to change our test certs;
- have our server open two sockets under the hood and listen on both IPv4 and
IPv6 (that's what gnutls-serv does, and IMO it's a good thing) but that
obviously requires development and testing (esp. for windows compatibility)
- wait for a newer version of GnuTLS to be released, install it on the CI and
developer machines, and use that in all tests - quite satisfying but can't
be done now (and puts stronger requirements on test environment).
From Hanno:
When a server replies to a cookieless ClientHello with a HelloVerifyRequest,
it is supposed to reset the connection and wait for a subsequent ClientHello
which includes the cookie from the HelloVerifyRequest.
In testing environments, it might happen that the reset of the server
takes longer than for the client to replying to the HelloVerifyRequest
with the ClientHello+Cookie. In this case, the ClientHello gets lost
and the client will need retransmit. This may happen even if the underlying
datagram transport is reliable.
This commit continues commit 47db877 by removing resend guards in the
ssl-opt.sh tests 'DTLS fragmenting: proxy MTU, XXX' which sometimes made
the tests fail in case the log showed a resend from the client.
See 47db877 for more information.
When a server replies to a cookieless ClientHello with a HelloVerifyRequest,
it is supposed to reset the connection and wait for a subsequent ClientHello
which includes the cookie from the HelloVerifyRequest.
In testing environments, it might happen that the reset of the server
takes longer than for the client to replying to the HelloVerifyRequest
with the ClientHello+Cookie. In this case, the ClientHello gets lost
and the client will need retransmit. This may happen even if the underlying
datagram transport is reliable.
This commit removes a guard in the ssl-opt.sh test
'DTLS fragmenting: proxy MTU, resumed handshake' which made
the test fail in case the log showed a resend from the client.
We previously observed random-looking failures from this test. I think they
were caused by a race condition where the client tries to reconnect while the
server is still closing the connection and has not yet returned to an
accepting state. In that case, the server would fail to see and reply to the
ClientHello, and the client would have to resend it.
I believe logs of failing runs are compatible with this interpretation:
- the proxy logs show the new ClientHello and the server's closing Alert are
sent the same millisecond.
- the client logs show the server's closing Alert is received after the new
handshake has been started (discarding message from wrong epoch).
The attempted fix is for the client to wait a bit before reconnecting, which
should vastly enhance the probability of the server reaching its accepting
state before the client tries to reconnect. The value of 1 second is arbitrary
but should be more than enough even on loaded machines.
The test was run locally 100 times in a row on a slightly loaded machine (an
instance of all.sh running in parallel) without any failure after this fix.
Use the same values as other 3d tests: this makes the test hopefully a bit
faster than the default values, while not increasing the failure rate.
While at it:
- adjust "needs_more_time" setting for 3d interop tests (we can't set the
timeout values for other implementations, so the test might be slow)
- fix some supposedly DTLS 1.0 test that were using dtls1_2 on the command
line
