It is enough only one test case for a key type, algorithm pair when
testing the implicit usage flags.
Signed-off-by: gabor-mezei-arm <gabor.mezei@arm.com>
Add test cases validating that if a stored key only had the hash policy,
then after loading it psa_get_key_attributes reports that it also has the
message policy, and the key can be used with message functions.
Signed-off-by: gabor-mezei-arm <gabor.mezei@arm.com>
These macros were moved into a header and now check-names.sh is failing.
Add an MBEDTLS_ prefix to the macro names to make it pass.
Signed-off-by: Janos Follath <janos.follath@arm.com>
Negative x coordinate was tested with the value -1. It happens to be one
of the low order points both for Curve25519 and Curve448 and might be
rejected because of that and not because it is negative. Make sure that
x < 0 is the only plausible reason for the point to be rejected.
Signed-off-by: Janos Follath <janos.follath@arm.com>
We were already rejecting them at the end, due to the fact that with the
usual (x, z) formulas they lead to the result (0, 0) so when we want to
normalize at the end, trying to compute the modular inverse of z will
give an error.
If we wanted to support those points, we'd a special case in
ecp_normalize_mxz(). But it's actually permitted by all sources (RFC
7748 say we MAY reject 0 as a result) and recommended by some to reject
those points (either to ensure contributory behaviour, or to protect
against timing attack when the underlying field arithmetic is not
constant-time).
Since our field arithmetic is indeed not constant-time, let's reject
those points before they get mixed with sensitive data (in
ecp_mul_mxz()), in order to avoid exploitable leaks caused by the
special cases they would trigger. (See the "May the Fourth" paper
https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/806.pdf)
Signed-off-by: Janos Follath <janos.follath@arm.com>
A test case for which the loop would take practically forever if it was
reached. The point would be to validate that the loop is not reached.
The test case should cause the CI to time out if starting with the
current code, ecp_check_pubkey_mx() was changed to call
ecp_check_pubkey_x25519() first and run the mbedtls_mpi_size(() test
afterwards, which would make no semantic difference in terms of memory
contents when the function returns, but would open the way for a DoS.
Signed-off-by: Janos Follath <janos.follath@arm.com>
Clang was complaining and check-names.sh too
This only duplicates macros, so no impact on code size. In 3.0 we can
probably avoid the duplication by using an internal header under
library/ but this won't work for 2.16.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
We were already rejecting them at the end, due to the fact that with the
usual (x, z) formulas they lead to the result (0, 0) so when we want to
normalize at the end, trying to compute the modular inverse of z will
give an error.
If we wanted to support those points, we'd a special case in
ecp_normalize_mxz(). But it's actually permitted by all sources
(RFC 7748 say we MAY reject 0 as a result) and recommended by some to
reject those points (either to ensure contributory behaviour, or to
protect against timing attack when the underlying field arithmetic is
not constant-time).
Since our field arithmetic is indeed not constant-time, let's reject
those points before they get mixed with sensitive data (in
ecp_mul_mxz()), in order to avoid exploitable leaks caused by the
special cases they would trigger. (See the "May the Fourth" paper
https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/806.pdf)
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
