The main goal with these tests is to test the bug in question and
they are not meant to test the entire PKCS#1 v1.5 behaviour. To
achieve full test coverage, further test cases are needed.
armar doesn't understand the syntax without dash. OTOH, the syntax with dash
is the only one specified by POSIX, and it's accepted by GNU ar, BSD ar (as
bundled with OS X) and armar, so it looks like the most portable syntax.
fixes#386
Let the client retry longer, to make sure the server will time out before the
client gives up. Make it really longer to get a deterministic client exit
status (make sure it has time to reconnect after the server timeout).
This helps in the case where an intermediate certificate is directly trusted.
In that case we want to ignore what comes after it in the chain, not only for
performance but also to avoid false negatives (eg an old root being no longer
trusted while the newer intermediate is directly trusted).
closes#220
As we're about to change the chain construction logic, we want to make sure
the callback will still be called exactly when it should, and not on the
(upcoming) ignored certs in the chain.
Tends to cause spurious failures on buildbots due to peer timing out.
Anyway, those tests are mainly for interop, any memory error is most likely
catched by some earlier self-op test. (Also, we'll run these tests with ASan
anyway.)
Once the mutex is acquired, we must goto cleanup rather that return.
Since cleanup adjusts the return value, adjust that in test cases.
Also, at cleanup we don't want to overwrite 'ret', or we'll loose track of
errors.
see #257
Apparently openssl s_server does not flush stdout, anyway sometimes the client
receives the reply and exits, thus terminating the test, before is request is
visible on the server's stdout. So, just don't check that, checking the
client's output and exit code is already enough.
Retry one time in case we have a client timeout. These should be fairly rare
but still happen from time to time with udp_proxy tests which is annoying, and
until now has never indicated an actual issue.
Rather than flat-out die when we can't see the server started with lsof, just
stop waiting and try to go ahead with the test. Maybe it'll work if there was
a problem with lsof, most probably it will fail, but at least we'll have the
log, and the results of the following tests.
Note: date +%s isn't POSIX, but it works at least on Linux, Darwin/FreeBSD and
OpenBSD, which should be good enough for a test script.
