People who prefer to rely on HMAC_DRBG (for example because they use it for
deterministic ECDSA and don't want a second DRBG for code size reasons) should
be able to build and run the tests suites without CTR_DRBG.
Ideally we should make sure the level of testing (SSL) is the same regardless
of which DRBG modules is enabled, but that's a more significant piece of work.
For now, just ensure everything builds and `make test` passes.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
While at it, fix a few other obvious ones such as ENTROPY and TIMING_C when
applicable.
A non-regression test for CTR_DRBG will be added in a follow-up commit.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
While at it, declare deps on ENTROPY as well.
A non-regression test will be added in a follow-up commit.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
Detected by Travis
https://travis-ci.org/github/ARMmbed/mbedtls/jobs/692213150
/home/travis/build/ARMmbed/mbedtls/include/mbedtls/x509_crt.h:333:
warning: argument 'make_copy' of command @param is not found in the
argument list of mbedtls_x509_crt_parse_der_with_ext_cb(mbedtls_x509_crt
*chain, const unsigned char *buf, size_t buflen, int no_copy,
mbedtls_x509_crt_ext_cb_t cb)
Signed-off-by: Nicola Di Lieto <nicola.dilieto@gmail.com>
Enable branch coverage output in basic_build_test.sh. This
includes enabling branch coverage output to the lcov make target,
which is disabled by default.
Signed-off-by: Dan Handley <dan.handley@arm.com>
This commit modifies the generate_psa_constants.py script to take as
input argument the location of where to write the
psa_constant_names_generated.c file.
For make-based build system, this commit does not change anything.
For CMake build system, this commit modifies the generation location of
that file to be inside the build directory and include it from there in
psa_constant_names.c
Fix#3365
Signed-off-by: Hugues de Valon <hugues.devalon@arm.com>
new name: mbedtls_x509_crt_parse_der_with_ext_cb
Co-authored-by: Gilles Peskine <gilles.peskine@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicola Di Lieto <nicola.dilieto@gmail.com>
The structure `mbedtls_ssl_transform` representing record protection
transformations should ideally be used through a function-based
interface only, as this will ease change of implementation as well
as the addition of new record protection routines in the future.
This commit makes a step in that direction by introducing the
helper function `ssl_transform_get_explicit_iv_len()` which
returns the size of the pre-expansion during record encryption
due to the potential addition of an explicit IV.
Signed-off-by: Hanno Becker <hanno.becker@arm.com>
This commit simplifies nonce derivation for AEAD based record protection
routines in the following way.
So far, code distinguished between the cases of GCM+CCM and ChachaPoly:
- In the case of GCM+CCM, the AEAD nonce is the concatentation
of a 4-byte Fixed IV and a dynamically chosen 8-byte IV which is prepended
to the record. In Mbed TLS, this is always chosen to be the record sequence
number, but it need not to.
- In the case of ChaChaPoly, the AEAD nonce is derived as
`( 12-byte Fixed IV ) XOR ( 0 || 8-byte dynamic IV == record seq nr )`
and the dynamically chosen IV is no longer prepended to the record.
This commit removes this distinction by always computing the record nonce
via the formula
`IV == ( Fixed IV || 0 ) XOR ( 0 || Dynamic IV )`
The ChaChaPoly case is recovered in case `Len(Fixed IV) == Len(IV)`, and
GCM+CCM is recovered when `Len(IV) == Len(Fixed IV) + Len(Dynamic IV)`.
Moreover, a getter stub `ssl_transform_aead_dynamic_iv_is_explicit()`
is introduced which infers from a transform whether the dynamically
chosen part of the IV is explicit, which in the current implementation
of `mbedtls_ssl_transform` can be derived from the helper field
`mbedtls_ssl_transform::fixed_ivlen`.
Signed-off-by: Hanno Becker <hanno.becker@arm.com>
The computation of the per-record nonce for AEAD record protection
varies with the AEAD algorithm and the TLS version in use.
This commit introduces a helper function for the nonce computation
to ease readability of the quite monolithic record encrytion routine.
Signed-off-by: Hanno Becker <hanno.becker@arm.com>
The previous record protection code added the explicit part of the
record nonce prior to encrypting the record. This temporarily leaves
the record structure in the undesireable state that the data outsie
of the interval `rec->data_offset, .., rec->data_offset + rec->data_len`
has already been written.
This commit moves the addition of the explicit IV past record encryption.
Signed-off-by: Hanno Becker <hanno.becker@arm.com>
TLS 1.3 and DTLS 1.2 + CID hide the real content type of a record
within the record's inner plaintext, while always using the same
content type for the protected record:
- TLS 1.3 always uses ApplicationData
- DTLS 1.2 + CID always uses a special CID content type.
This commit enhances the record encryption unit test to check
that the record content type is indeed correctly hidden.
Signed-off-by: Hanno Becker <hanno.becker@arm.com>
The internal functions
`ssl_cid_{build/parse}_inner_plaintext()`
implement the TLSInnerPlaintext mechanism used by DTLS 1.2 + CID
in order to allow for flexible length padding and to protect the
true content type of a record.
This feature is also present in TLS 1.3 support for which is under
development. As a preparatory step towards sharing the code between
the case of DTLS 1.2 + CID and TLS 1.3, this commit renames
`ssl_cid_{build/parse}_inner_plaintext()`
to
`ssl_{build/parse}_inner_plaintext()`.
Signed-off-by: Hanno Becker <hanno.becker@arm.com>
Convert all text files to Unix line endings unless they're Windows
stuff.
Make sure that all text files have a trailing newline.
Remove whitespace at the end of lines.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
We're only interested in files that are committed and pushed to be
included in Mbed TLS, not in any other files that may be lying around.
So ask git for the list of file names.
This script is primarily intended to run on the CI, and there it runs
on a fresh Git checkout plus potentially some other checkouts or
leftovers from a previous part of the CI job. It should also run
reasonably well on developer machines, where there may be various
additional files. In both cases, git is available.
Ad hoc directory exclusions are no longer needed.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Have an explicit list of exemptions for specific checks rather than
whitelisting files to check. Some checks, such as permissions, should
apply to all files.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
