target/arm: Fix SVE signed division vs x86 overflow exception

We already check for the same condition within the normal integer
sdiv and sdiv64 helpers. Use a slightly different formation that
does not require deducing the expression type.

Backports commit 7e8fafbfd0537937ba8fb366a90ea6548cc31576 from qemu
This commit is contained in:
Richard Henderson 2018-07-03 05:05:54 -04:00 committed by Lioncash
parent 27afa92f24
commit f64e48dbee
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4E3C3CC1031BA9C7

View file

@ -368,7 +368,15 @@ void HELPER(NAME)(void *vd, void *vn, void *vm, void *vg, uint32_t desc) \
#define DO_MIN(N, M) ((N) >= (M) ? (M) : (N))
#define DO_ABD(N, M) ((N) >= (M) ? (N) - (M) : (M) - (N))
#define DO_MUL(N, M) (N * M)
#define DO_DIV(N, M) (M ? N / M : 0)
/*
* We must avoid the C undefined behaviour cases: division by
* zero and signed division of INT_MIN by -1. Both of these
* have architecturally defined required results for Arm.
* We special case all signed divisions by -1 to avoid having
* to deduce the minimum integer for the type involved.
*/
#define DO_SDIV(N, M) (unlikely(M == 0) ? 0 : unlikely(M == -1) ? -N : N / M)
#define DO_UDIV(N, M) (unlikely(M == 0) ? 0 : N / M)
DO_ZPZZ(sve_and_zpzz_b, uint8_t, H1, DO_AND)
DO_ZPZZ(sve_and_zpzz_h, uint16_t, H1_2, DO_AND)
@ -476,11 +484,11 @@ DO_ZPZZ(sve_umulh_zpzz_h, uint16_t, H1_2, do_mulh_h)
DO_ZPZZ(sve_umulh_zpzz_s, uint32_t, H1_4, do_mulh_s)
DO_ZPZZ_D(sve_umulh_zpzz_d, uint64_t, do_umulh_d)
DO_ZPZZ(sve_sdiv_zpzz_s, int32_t, H1_4, DO_DIV)
DO_ZPZZ_D(sve_sdiv_zpzz_d, int64_t, DO_DIV)
DO_ZPZZ(sve_sdiv_zpzz_s, int32_t, H1_4, DO_SDIV)
DO_ZPZZ_D(sve_sdiv_zpzz_d, int64_t, DO_SDIV)
DO_ZPZZ(sve_udiv_zpzz_s, uint32_t, H1_4, DO_DIV)
DO_ZPZZ_D(sve_udiv_zpzz_d, uint64_t, DO_DIV)
DO_ZPZZ(sve_udiv_zpzz_s, uint32_t, H1_4, DO_UDIV)
DO_ZPZZ_D(sve_udiv_zpzz_d, uint64_t, DO_UDIV)
/* Note that all bits of the shift are significant
and not modulo the element size. */