mirror of
https://github.com/yuzu-emu/yuzu-mainline.git
synced 2024-12-30 23:15:42 +00:00
shader_decode: Implement FMUL_C, FMUL_R and FMUL_IMM
This commit is contained in:
parent
4c70d5b8eb
commit
7c192ec43f
|
@ -36,6 +36,48 @@ u32 ShaderIR::DecodeArithmetic(BasicBlock& bb, u32 pc) {
|
|||
SetRegister(bb, instr.gpr0, op_b);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
case OpCode::Id::FMUL_C:
|
||||
case OpCode::Id::FMUL_R:
|
||||
case OpCode::Id::FMUL_IMM: {
|
||||
// FMUL does not have 'abs' bits and only the second operand has a 'neg' bit.
|
||||
UNIMPLEMENTED_IF_MSG(instr.fmul.tab5cb8_2 != 0, "FMUL tab5cb8_2({}) is not implemented",
|
||||
instr.fmul.tab5cb8_2.Value());
|
||||
UNIMPLEMENTED_IF_MSG(
|
||||
instr.fmul.tab5c68_0 != 1, "FMUL tab5cb8_0({}) is not implemented",
|
||||
instr.fmul.tab5c68_0.Value()); // SMO typical sends 1 here which seems to be the default
|
||||
UNIMPLEMENTED_IF_MSG(instr.generates_cc,
|
||||
"Condition codes generation in FMUL is not implemented");
|
||||
|
||||
op_b = GetOperandAbsNegFloat(op_b, false, instr.fmul.negate_b);
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO(Rodrigo): Should precise be used when there's a postfactor?
|
||||
Node value = Operation(OperationCode::FMul, PRECISE, op_a, op_b);
|
||||
|
||||
if (instr.fmul.postfactor != 0) {
|
||||
auto postfactor = static_cast<s32>(instr.fmul.postfactor);
|
||||
|
||||
// Postfactor encoded as 3-bit 1's complement in instruction, interpreted with below
|
||||
// logic.
|
||||
if (postfactor >= 4) {
|
||||
postfactor = 7 - postfactor;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
postfactor = 0 - postfactor;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (postfactor > 0) {
|
||||
value = Operation(OperationCode::FMul, NO_PRECISE, value,
|
||||
Immediate(static_cast<f32>(1 << postfactor)));
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
value = Operation(OperationCode::FDiv, NO_PRECISE, value,
|
||||
Immediate(static_cast<f32>(1 << -postfactor)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
value = GetSaturatedFloat(value, instr.alu.saturate_d);
|
||||
|
||||
SetRegister(bb, instr.gpr0, value);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
default:
|
||||
UNIMPLEMENTED_MSG("Unhandled arithmetic instruction: {}", opcode->get().GetName());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue