None of the test cases in tests_suite_memory_buffer_alloc actually
need MBEDTLS_MEMORY_DEBUG. Some have additional checks when
MBEDTLS_MEMORY_DEBUG but all are useful even without it. So enable
them all and #ifdef out the parts that require DEBUG.
The test case "Memory buffer small buffer" emits a message
"FATAL: verification of first header failed". In this test case, it's
actually expected, but it looks weird to see this message from a
passing test. Add a comment that states this explicitly, and modify
the test description to indicate that the failure is expected, and
change the test function name to be more accurate.
Fix#309
When running 'make test' with GNU make, if a test suite program
displays "PASSED", this was automatically counted as a pass. This
would in particular count as passing:
* A test suite with the substring "PASSED" in a test description.
* A test suite where all the test cases succeeded, but the final
cleanup failed, in particular if a sanitizer reported a memory leak.
Use the test executable's return status instead to determine whether
the test suite passed. It's always 0 on PASSED unless the executable's
cleanup code fails, and it's never 0 on any failure.
FixARMmbed/mbed-crypto#303
Some sanitizers default to displaying an error message and recovering.
This could result in a test being recorded as passing despite a
complaint from the sanitizer. Turn off sanitizer recovery to avoid
this risk.
* origin/pr/2860: (26 commits)
config.pl full: exclude MBEDTLS_CTR_DRBG_USE_128_BIT_KEY
mbedtls_hmac_drbg_set_entropy_len() only matters when reseeding
mbedtls_ctr_drbg_set_entropy_len() only matters when reseeding
mbedtls_ctr_drbg_seed: correct maximum for len
Add a note about CTR_DRBG security strength to config.h
Move MBEDTLS_CTR_DRBG_USE_128_BIT_KEY to the correct section
CTR_DRBG: more consistent formatting and wording
CTR_DRBG documentation: further wording improvements
CTR_DRBG: Improve the explanation of security strength
CTR_DRBG: make it easier to understand the security strength
HMAC_DRBG: note that the initial seeding grabs entropy for the nonce
Use standard terminology to describe the personalization string
Do note that xxx_drbg_random functions reseed with PR enabled
Consistently use \c NULL and \c 0
Also mention HMAC_DRBG in the changelog entry
HMAC_DRBG: improve the documentation of the entropy length
HMAC_DRBG documentation improvements clarifications
More CTR_DRBG documentation improvements and clarifications
Fix wording
Remove warning that the previous expanded discussion has obsoleted
...
The documentation of HMAC_DRBG erroneously claimed that
mbedtls_hmac_drbg_set_entropy_len() had an impact on the initial
seeding. This is in fact not the case: mbedtls_hmac_drbg_seed() forces
the entropy length to its chosen value. Fix the documentation.
The documentation of CTR_DRBG erroneously claimed that
mbedtls_ctr_drbg_set_entropy_len() had an impact on the initial
seeding. This is in fact not the case: mbedtls_ctr_drbg_seed() forces
the initial seeding to grab MBEDTLS_CTR_DRBG_ENTROPY_LEN bytes of
entropy. Fix the documentation and rewrite the discussion of the
entropy length and the security strength accordingly.
* origin/pr/2864:
Fix compilation error
Add const to variable
Fix endianity issue when reading uint32
Increase test suite timeout
Reduce stack usage of test_suite_pkcs1_v15
Reduce stack usage of test_suite_pkcs1_v21
Reduce stack usage of test_suite_rsa
Reduce stack usage of test_suite_pk
Explain how MBEDTLS_CTR_DRBG_ENTROPY_LEN is set next to the security
strength statement, rather than giving a partial explanation (current
setting only) in the documentation of MBEDTLS_CTR_DRBG_ENTROPY_LEN.
NIST and many other sources call it a "personalization string", and
certainly not "device-specific identifiers" which is actually somewhat
misleading since this is just one of many things that might go into a
personalization string.
Improve the formatting and writing of the documentation based on what
had been done for CTR_DRBG.
Document the maximum size and nullability of some buffer parameters.
Exercise the library functions with calloc returning NULL for a size
of 0. Make this a separate job with UBSan (and ASan) to detect
places where we try to dereference the result of calloc(0) or to do
things like
buf = calloc(size, 1);
if (buf == NULL && size != 0) return INSUFFICIENT_MEMORY;
memcpy(buf, source, size);
which has undefined behavior when buf is NULL at the memcpy call even
if size is 0.
This is needed because other test components jobs either use the system
malloc which returns non-NULL on Linux and FreeBSD, or the
memory_buffer_alloc malloc which returns NULL but does not give as
useful feedback with ASan (because the whole heap is a single C
object).
Add a very basic test of calloc to the selftest program. The selftest
program acts in its capacity as a platform compatibility checker rather
than in its capacity as a test of the library.
The main objective is to report whether calloc returns NULL for a size
of 0. Also observe whether a free/alloc sequence returns the address
that was just freed and whether a size overflow is properly detected.
This is a documentation-only change, but one that users who care about
NIST compliance may be interested in, to review if they're using the
module in a compliant way.
Document that a derivation function is used.
Document the security strength of the DRBG depending on the
compile-time configuration and how it is set up. In particular,
document how the nonce specified in SP 800-90A is set.
Mention how to link the ctr_drbg module with the entropy module.
The uint32 is given as a bigendian stream, in the tests, however,
the char buffer that collected the stream read it as is,
without converting it. Add a temporary buffer, to call `greentea_getc()`
8 times, and then put it in the correct endianity for input to `unhexify()`.
Reduce the stack usage of the `test_suite_pkcs1_v21` by reducing the
size of the buffers used in the tests, to a reasonable big enough size,
and change the size sent to the API to sizeof output.
Reduce the stack usage of the `test_suite_rsa` by reducing the
size of the buffers used in the tests, to a reasonable big enough size,
and change the data size to decrypt in the data file.
* State explicit whether several numbers are in bits or bytes.
* Clarify whether buffer pointer parameters can be NULL.
* Explain the value of constants that are dependent on the configuration.
