Multiplication is not constant flow on any CPU we are generally
targetting, so replace this with bit twiddling.
Signed-off-by: Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@arm.com>
Marked dirty memory ends up in the result buffer after encoding (due to
the input having been marked dirty), and then the final comparison
to make sure that we got what we expected was triggering the constant
flow checker.
Signed-off-by: Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@arm.com>
Fix a stack buffer overflow with mbedtls_net_poll() and
mbedtls_net_recv_timeout() when given a file descriptor that is beyond
FD_SETSIZE. The bug was due to not checking that the file descriptor
is within the range of an fd_set object.
Fix#4169
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Although the library documentation does not guarantee that calling
mbedtls_entropy_free() twice works, it's a plausible assumption and it's
natural to write code that frees an object twice. While this is uncommon for
an entropy context, which is usually a global variable, it came up in our
own unit tests (random_twice tests in test_suite_random in the
development branch).
Announce this in the same changelog entry as for RSA because it's the same
bug in the two modules.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
These tests validate that an entropy object can be reused and that
calling mbedtls_entropy_free() twice is ok.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
mbedtls_rsa_gen_key() was not freeing the RSA object, and specifically
not freeing the mutex, in some error cases.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
When MBEDTLS_THREADING_C is enabled, RSA code protects the use of the
key with a mutex. mbedtls_rsa_free() frees this mutex by calling
mbedtls_mutex_free(). This does not match the usage of
mbedtls_mutex_free(), which in general can only be done once.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
These tests are trivial except when compiling with MBEDTLS_THREADING_C
and a mutex implementation that are picky about matching each
mbedtls_mutex_init() with exactly one mbedtls_mutex_free().
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Jones <christopher.jones@arm.com>
random(), and only this function, is thread-safe.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Jones <christopher.jones@arm.com>
mbedtls_hmac_drbg_free() left a mutex in the initialized state. This
caused a resource leak on platforms where mbedtls_mutex_init()
allocates resources.
To fix this, mbedtls_hmac_drbg_free() no longer reinitializes the
mutex. To preserve the property that mbedtls_hmac_drbg_free() leaves
the object in an initialized state, which is generally true throughout
the library except regarding mutex objects on some platforms, no
longer initialize the mutex in mbedtls_hmac_drbg_init(). Since the
mutex is only used after seeding, and seeding is only permitted once,
call mbedtls_mutex_init() as part of the seeding process.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
random(), and only this function, is thread-safe.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Jones <christopher.jones@arm.com>
mbedtls_ctr_drbg_free() left a mutex in the initialized state. This
caused a resource leak on platforms where mbedtls_mutex_init()
allocates resources.
To fix this, mbedtls_ctr_drbg_free() no longer reinitializes the
mutex. To preserve the property that mbedtls_ctr_drbg_free() leaves
the object in an initialized state, which is generally true throughout
the library except regarding mutex objects on some platforms, no
longer initialize the mutex in mbedtls_ctr_drbg_init(). Since the
mutex is only used after seeding, and seeding is only permitted once,
call mbedtls_mutex_init() as part of the seeding process.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Document the usage inside the library, and relate it with how it's
additionally used in the test code.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Subtract the number of calls to mbedtls_mutex_free() from the number
of calls to mbedtls_mutex_init(). A mutex leak will manifest as a
positive result at the end of the test case.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Jones <christopher.jones@arm.com>
If the mutex usage verification framework is enabled and it detects a
mutex usage error, report this error and mark the test as failed.
This detects most usage errors, but not all cases of using
uninitialized memory (which is impossible in full generality) and not
leaks due to missing free (which will be handled in a subsequent commit).
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Jones <christopher.jones@arm.com>
Check that the source address and the frame counter have the expected
length. Otherwise, if the test data was invalid, the test code could
build nonsensical inputs, potentially overflowing the iv buffer.
The primary benefit of this change is that it also silences a warning
from compiling with `gcc-10 -O3` (observed with GCC 10.2.0 on
Linux/amd64). GCC unrolled the loops and complained about a buffer
overflow with warnings like:
```
suites/test_suite_ccm.function: In function 'test_mbedtls_ccm_star_auth_decrypt':
suites/test_suite_ccm.function:271:15: error: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Werror=stringop-overflow=]
271 | iv[i] = source_address->x[i];
| ~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
suites/test_suite_ccm.function:254:19: note: at offset [13, 14] to object 'iv' with size 13 declared here
254 | unsigned char iv[13];
```
Just using memcpy instead of loops bypasses this warnings. The added
checks are a bonus.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
When using pthread mutexes (MBEDTLS_THREADING_C and
MBEDTLS_THREADING_PTHREAD enabled), and when test hooks are
enabled (MBEDTLS_TEST_HOOKS), set up wrappers around the
mbedtls_mutex_xxx abstraction. In this commit, the wrapper functions
don't do anything yet.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Jones <christopher.jones@arm.com>
Don't reference the architecture document. This is an LTS branch and
new invasive tests are only going to be introduced as (perhaps partial
or adapted) backports of invasive tests from development anyway.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
