We don't really need a secure hash for that, something like CRC32 would
probably be enough - but we have SHA-256 handy, not CRC32, so use that for the
sake of simplicity.
By semi-internal I mean functions that are only public because they're used in
more than once compilation unit in the library (for example in ecc.c and
ecc_dsa.c) but should not really be part of the public-facing API.
Same motivation as for the other parameters. This is the last one, making the
curve structure empty, so it's left with a dummy parameter for legal reasons.
-Add flow monitor, loop integrity check and variable doubling to
harden mbedtls_hmac_drbg_update_ret.
-Use longer hamming distance for nonce usage in hmac_drbg_reseed_core
-Return actual value instead of success in mbedtls_hmac_drbg_seed and
mbedtls_hmac_drbg_seed_buf
-Check illegal condition in hmac_drbg_reseed_core.
-Double buf/buf_len variables in mbedtls_hmac_drbg_random_with_add
-Add more hamming distance to MBEDTLS_HMAC_DRBG_PR_ON/OFF
Added an additional Makefile option of 'TINYCRYPT_BUILD' to exclude the
TinyCrypt source files from the build. This allows some tests to exclude those
files as and when necessary.
Specifically this includes in all.sh the test
'component_build_arm_none_eabi_gcc_no_64bit_multiplication' which was failing as
64bit cannot be disabled in TinyCrypt, and check-names.sh as TinyCrypt obviously
does not conform to Mbed TLS naming conventions.
This commit removes from the TinyCrypt header and source code files, the
configuration condition on MBEDTLS_USE_TINYCRYPT to include the file
contents.
This is to allow use of the library by the Factory Tool without enabling
MBEDTLS_USE_TINYCRYPT, and also removes a modification we've made to make the
code closer to the upstream TinyCrypt making it easier to maintain.
Validating the input is always a good idea. Validating the output protects
against some fault injections that would make the result invalid.
Note: valid_point() implies that the point is not zero.
Adding validation to mult_safer() makes it redundant in
compute_shared_secret().
This will make easier to add future counter-measures in a single place.
In practice this change means that:
- compute_public_key() now uses projective coordinate randomisation, which it
should as this is a protection against Template Attacks for example.
- mult_safer() now checks that the result is not the point at infinity, which
it can as the result is indeed never expected to be that
In the previous version, it was enough for the attacker to glitch the
top-level 'if' to skip the entire block. We want two independent blocks here,
so that an attacker can only succeed with two successive glitches.
Before this commit, if a certificate only had one issue (for example, if the
"untrusted" bit was the only set in flags), an attacker that could flip this
single bit between the moment it's set and the moment flags are checked before
returning from mbedtls_x509_crt_verify() could make the entire verification
routine appear to succeed (return 0 with no bit set in flags).
Avoid that by making sure that flags always has either 0 or at least 9 bits
set during the execution of the function. However, to preserve the API, clear
the 8 extra bits before returning. This doesn't open the door to other
attacks, as fortunately the API already had redundancy: either both flags and
the return value are 0, or flags has bits set and the return value is non-zero
with at least 16 bits set (assuming 32-bit 2-complement ints).
If signature_is_good is 0 (invalid) of 1 (valid), then it's all too easy for
an active physical attacker to turn invalid into valid by flipping a single
bit in RAM, on the bus or in a CPU register.
Use a special value to represent "valid" that can't easily be reached by
flipping a few bits.
x509_crt_check_signature() directly returns the return value of
pk_verify_xxx() without looking at it, so nothing to do here. But its caller
compares the value to 0, which ought to be double-checked.
Inspection of the generated assembly showed that before this commit, armcc 5
was optimizing away the successive reads to the volatile local variable that's
used for double-checks. Inspection also reveals that inserting a call to an
external function is enough to prevent it from doing that.
The tested versions of ARM-GCC, Clang and Armcc 6 (aka armclang) all keep the
double read, with our without a call to an external function in the middle.
The inserted function can also be changed to insert a random delay if
desired in the future, as it is appropriately places between the reads.
This can be used by Mbed TLS functions in any module to signal that a fault
attack is likely happening, so this can be appropriately handled by the
application (report, fall back to safer mode or even halt, etc.)
This hardens against attacks that glitch the conditional branch by making it
necessary for the attacker to inject two consecutive faults instead of one. If
desired, we could insert a random delay in order to further protect against
double-glitch attacks.
Also, when a single glitch is detected we report it.
Previously it was returning 0 or 1, so flipping a single bit in the return
value reversed its meaning. Now it's returning the diff itself.
This is safe because in the two places it's used (signature verification and
point validation), invalid values will have a large number of bits differing
from the expected value, so diff will have a large Hamming weight.
An alternative would be to return for example -!(diff == 0), but the
comparison itself is prone to attacks (glitching the appropriate flag in the
CPU flags register, or the conditional branch if the comparison uses one). So
we'd need to protect the comparison, and it's simpler to just skip it and
return diff itself.
This is a first step in protecting against fault injection attacks: the
attacker can no longer change failure into success by flipping a single bit.
Additional steps are needed to prevent other attacks (instruction skip etc)
and will be the object of future commits.
The return value of uECC_vli_equal() should be protected as well, which will
be done in a future commit as well.
Currently functions that may return success or failure tend to do so by
returning 0 or 1. If an active physical attacker can flip a bit in memory or
registers at the right time, they may easily change a failure value into a
success value, with potentially catastrophic security consequences.
As typical attackers can only flip a few bits, an element of protection
against such attacks is to ensure a sufficient Hamming distance between
failure values and the success value. This commit introduces such values,
which will put to use in critical functions in future commits.
In addition to SUCCESS and FAILURE, a third value ATTACK_DETECTED is
introduced, which can be used later when suspicious-looking events are noticed
(static data changed when it shouldn't, double condition checking returning
inconsistent results, etc.).
Values are chosen so that Hamming distances are large, and that no value is
the complement of another, in order to avoid unwanted compiler optimisations.
Note: the error values used by Mbed TLS are already safe (assuming 32-bit
integers) as they are of the form -x with x in the range [1, 2^15) so their
Hamming distance with the success value (0) is at least 17, so it's hard for
an attacker to turn an error value into the success value (or vice-versa).
This is a temporary work-around for an integration issue.
A future task will re-integrate randomness into these functions are their
entire point is to be randomized; this is really just temporary.
