./src/render/SDL_render.c(2168): Error! E1054: Expression must be constant
./src/render/SDL_render.c(2168): Error! E1054: Expression must be constant
./src/render/SDL_render.c(2175): Error! E1054: Expression must be constant
./src/render/SDL_render.c(2175): Error! E1054: Expression must be constant
./src/render/SDL_render.c(2322): Error! E1054: Expression must be constant
./src/render/SDL_render.c(2322): Error! E1054: Expression must be constant
./src/render/SDL_render.c(2322): Error! E1054: Expression must be constant
./src/render/SDL_render.c(2322): Error! E1054: Expression must be constant
./src/render/SDL_render.c(2329): Error! E1054: Expression must be constant
./src/render/SDL_render.c(2329): Error! E1054: Expression must be constant
./src/render/SDL_render.c(2329): Error! E1054: Expression must be constant
./src/render/SDL_render.c(2329): Error! E1054: Expression must be constant
./src/render/software/SDL_render_sw.c(602): Error! E1054: Expression must be constant
./src/render/software/SDL_render_sw.c(602): Error! E1054: Expression must be constant
./src/render/software/SDL_render_sw.c(602): Error! E1054: Expression must be constant
./src/render/software/SDL_render_sw.c(602): Error! E1054: Expression must be constant
https://bugzilla.libsdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4350
We can't safely call GL_DestroyRenderer() until GL_LoadFunctions()
succeeds because we will be missing functions that we try to use
when activating the renderer for destruction if we have an GL context.
Sylvain
Re-opening this issue.
It fixes the test-case, but it introduces a regression with another bug (bug #4313).
So here's a new patch that activate cropping of the source surface to solve the issue.
It also reverts the wrong changeset.
It prevents unneeded colorkey error message.
Include guards in most changed files were missing, I added them keeping
the same style as other SDL files. In some cases I moved the include
guards around to be the first thing the header has to take advantage of
any possible improvements compiler may have for inclusion guards.
I have no idea if this works (or if it ever worked, having now examined this
code), as I have no way to compile or test this.
If it's broken, send patches. :)
This means it doesn't have to block while the current frame finishes using the
vertex buffer; it just moves on to the next, probably-not-in-use buffer.
